Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs Radeon HD 6950

Intro

The GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 uses a 65 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core frequency at 576 MHz. The GDDR3 memory works at a frequency of 999 MHz on this model. It features 216 SPUs along with 72 TAUs and 28 ROPs.

Compare those specifications to the Radeon HD 6950, which features clock speeds of 800 MHz on the GPU, and 1250 MHz on the 1024 MB of GDDR5 RAM. It features 1408 SPUs as well as 88 TAUs and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon HD 6950 200 Watts
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 202 Watts
Difference: 2 Watts (1%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the Radeon HD 6950 should be 43% quicker than the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 overall, due to its higher data rate. (explain)

Radeon HD 6950 160000 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 111888 MB/sec
Difference: 48112 (43%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon HD 6950 will be much (about 70%) better at texture filtering than the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216. (explain)

Radeon HD 6950 70400 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 41472 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 28928 (70%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon HD 6950 will be a lot (more or less 59%) better at anti-aliasing than the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216, and also will be capable of handling higher resolutions without slowing down too much. (explain)

Radeon HD 6950 25600 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 16128 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 9472 (59%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon HD 6950

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Radeon HD 6950
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year September 16, 2008 December 2010
Code Name G200 Cayman Pro
Memory 896 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 576 MHz 800 MHz
Memory Speed 1998 MHz 5000 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 202 watts 200 watts
Bandwidth 111888 MB/sec 160000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 41472 Mtexels/sec 70400 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 16128 Mpixels/sec 25600 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 216 1408
Texture Mapping Units 72 88
Render Output Units 28 32
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 448-bit 256-bit
Fab Process 65 nm 40 nm
Transistors 1400 million 2640 million
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.1

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of data (counted in MB per second) that can be moved across the external memory interface in a second. The number is worked out by multiplying the bus width by the speed of its memory. In the case of DDR memory, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are applied per second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total texture units by the core speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics card can possibly record to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the number of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel rate also depends on many other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon HD 6950

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield