Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GT 320 vs GeForce GTX 1650

Intro

The GeForce GT 320 features a GPU clock speed of 540 MHz, and the 1024 MB of GDDR3 memory is set to run at 790 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also is comprised of 72 SPUs, 24 Texture Address Units, and 8 ROPs.

Compare those specifications to the GeForce GTX 1650, which features a core clock frequency of 1485 MHz and a GDDR5 memory speed of 2001 MHz. It also features a 128-bit bus, and uses a 12 nm design. It is comprised of 896 SPUs, 56 TAUs, and 32 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GT 320 43 Watts
GeForce GTX 1650 75 Watts
Difference: 32 Watts (74%)

Memory Bandwidth

Performance-wise, the GeForce GTX 1650 should in theory be quite a bit superior to the GeForce GT 320 overall. (explain)

GeForce GTX 1650 131072 MB/sec
GeForce GT 320 25280 MB/sec
Difference: 105792 (418%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 1650 should be quite a bit (more or less 542%) more effective at texture filtering than the GeForce GT 320. (explain)

GeForce GTX 1650 83160 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GT 320 12960 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 70200 (542%)

Pixel Rate

If using lots of anti-aliasing is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 1650 is the winner, by far. (explain)

GeForce GTX 1650 47520 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GT 320 4320 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 43200 (1000%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 320

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

GeForce GTX 1650

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GT 320 GeForce GTX 1650
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year February 2010 April 2019
Code Name GT215 TU117-300-A1
Memory 1024 MB 4096 MB
Core Speed 540 MHz 1485 MHz
Memory Speed 1580 MHz 8004 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 43 watts 75 watts
Bandwidth 25280 MB/sec 131072 MB/sec
Texel Rate 12960 Mtexels/sec 83160 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 4320 Mpixels/sec 47520 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 72 896
Texture Mapping Units 24 56
Render Output Units 8 32
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 40 nm 12 nm
Transistors 727 million 4700 million
Bus PCIe x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10.1 DirectX 12.0
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.3 OpenGL 4.6

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of information (counted in megabytes per second) that can be transported across the external memory interface in a second. The number is calculated by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory speed. If the card has DDR memory, it must be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the card's memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are applied per second. This is worked out by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels that the graphics card can possibly write to the local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is worked out by multiplying the amount of Raster Operations Pipelines by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 320

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

GeForce GTX 1650

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield