Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R7 240

Intro

The GeForce GTX 1650 has a clock speed of 1485 MHz and a GDDR5 memory speed of 2001 MHz. It also makes use of a 128-bit bus, and makes use of a 12 nm design. It is comprised of 896 SPUs, 56 TAUs, and 32 Raster Operation Units.

Compare those specifications to the Radeon R7 240, which has a core clock frequency of 730 MHz and a DDR3 memory frequency of 900 MHz. It also uses a 128-bit memory bus, and uses a 28 nm design. It features 320 SPUs, 20 Texture Address Units, and 8 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon R7 240 30 Watts
GeForce GTX 1650 75 Watts
Difference: 45 Watts (150%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the GeForce GTX 1650 should perform much faster than the Radeon R7 240 in general. (explain)

GeForce GTX 1650 131072 MB/sec
Radeon R7 240 28800 MB/sec
Difference: 102272 (355%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 1650 is quite a bit (more or less 470%) better at anisotropic filtering than the Radeon R7 240. (explain)

GeForce GTX 1650 83160 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R7 240 14600 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 68560 (470%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 1650 is quite a bit (about 714%) faster with regards to FSAA than the Radeon R7 240, and should be able to handle higher resolutions while still performing well. (explain)

GeForce GTX 1650 47520 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R7 240 5840 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 41680 (714%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 1650

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 240

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 1650 Radeon R7 240
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year April 2019 October 2013
Code Name TU117-300-A1 Oland PRO
Memory 4096 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 1485 MHz 730 MHz
Memory Speed 8004 MHz 1800 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 75 watts 30 watts
Bandwidth 131072 MB/sec 28800 MB/sec
Texel Rate 83160 Mtexels/sec 14600 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 47520 Mpixels/sec 5840 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 896 320
Texture Mapping Units 56 20
Render Output Units 32 8
Bus Type GDDR5 DDR3
Bus Width 128-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 12 nm 28 nm
Transistors 4700 million 1040 million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 12.0 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.6 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of information (measured in megabytes per second) that can be transferred across the external memory interface within a second. The number is worked out by multiplying the bus width by the speed of its memory. If it uses DDR type memory, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that are processed per second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units by the core speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics card could possibly record to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the amount of ROPs by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel fill rate also depends on many other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 1650

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 240

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield