GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs Radeon RX Vega 64

Intro

Compare those specs to the Radeon RX Vega 64, which uses a 14 nm design. AMD has clocked the core speed at 1247 MHz. The HBM2 RAM works at a frequency of 1890 MHz on this model. It features 4096 SPUs as well as 256 TAUs and 64 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

Radeon RX Vega 64		21986 points
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448		4200 points
	Difference: 17786 (423%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448		210 Watts
Radeon RX Vega 64		295 Watts
	Difference: 85 Watts (40%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically, the Radeon RX Vega 64 should be quite a bit faster than the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 in general. (explain)

Radeon RX Vega 64		495411 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448		144000 MB/sec
	Difference: 351411 (244%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon RX Vega 64 is a lot (approximately 679%) better at AF than the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448. (explain)

Radeon RX Vega 64		319232 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448		40992 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 278240 (679%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon RX Vega 64 should be much (approximately 173%) better at anti-aliasing than the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448, and should be capable of handling higher screen resolutions without slowing down too much. (explain)

Radeon RX Vega 64		79808 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448		29280 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 50528 (173%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of data (in units of MB per second) that can be transferred past the external memory interface within a second. It's calculated by multiplying the interface width by its memory speed. If it uses DDR type memory, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that can be processed in one second. This number is worked out by multiplying the total amount of texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the video card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics chip can possibly write to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is worked out by multiplying the number of ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel rate also depends on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the max fill rate.