GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs Radeon RX Vega 64

Intro

Compare all of that to the Radeon RX Vega 64, which makes use of a 14 nm design. AMD has set the core frequency at 1247 MHz. The HBM2 RAM runs at a speed of 1890 MHz on this specific model. It features 4096 SPUs as well as 256 TAUs and 64 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

Radeon RX Vega 64		21986 points
GeForce GTX 650 Ti		3434 points
	Difference: 18552 (540%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 650 Ti		110 Watts
Radeon RX Vega 64		295 Watts
	Difference: 185 Watts (168%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the Radeon RX Vega 64 should perform a lot faster than the GeForce GTX 650 Ti overall. (explain)

Radeon RX Vega 64		495411 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 650 Ti		86400 MB/sec
	Difference: 409011 (473%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon RX Vega 64 is a lot (about 438%) more effective at texture filtering than the GeForce GTX 650 Ti. (explain)

Radeon RX Vega 64		319232 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 650 Ti		59392 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 259840 (438%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon RX Vega 64 should be quite a bit (about 438%) more effective at FSAA than the GeForce GTX 650 Ti, and also capable of handling higher resolutions without losing too much performance. (explain)

Radeon RX Vega 64		79808 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 650 Ti		14848 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 64960 (438%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of information (counted in megabytes per second) that can be transported past the external memory interface within a second. The number is worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by the speed of its memory. If it uses DDR type memory, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed per second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels that the graphics chip can possibly record to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is worked out by multiplying the number of Render Output Units by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel rate is also dependant on many other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the max fill rate.