GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs Radeon RX Vega 56

Intro

Compare all of that to the Radeon RX Vega 56, which makes use of a 14 nm design. AMD has set the core speed at 1156 MHz. The HBM2 RAM is set to run at a speed of 1600 MHz on this specific card. It features 3584 SPUs along with 224 Texture Address Units and 64 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

Radeon RX Vega 56		21011 points
GeForce GTX 650 Ti		3434 points
	Difference: 17577 (512%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 650 Ti		110 Watts
Radeon RX Vega 56		210 Watts
	Difference: 100 Watts (91%)

Memory Bandwidth

As far as performance goes, the Radeon RX Vega 56 should theoretically be a lot superior to the GeForce GTX 650 Ti in general. (explain)

Radeon RX Vega 56		419430 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 650 Ti		86400 MB/sec
	Difference: 333030 (385%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon RX Vega 56 will be a lot (approximately 336%) more effective at anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GTX 650 Ti. (explain)

Radeon RX Vega 56		258944 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 650 Ti		59392 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 199552 (336%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is quite a bit (about 398%) better at full screen anti-aliasing than the GeForce GTX 650 Ti, and also should be able to handle higher screen resolutions better. (explain)

Radeon RX Vega 56		73984 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 650 Ti		14848 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 59136 (398%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of data (in units of megabytes per second) that can be moved across the external memory interface in a second. The number is calculated by multiplying the bus width by its memory speed. In the case of DDR memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are applied per second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics chip could possibly record to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is worked out by multiplying the number of colour ROPs by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel output rate is also dependant on many other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the maximum fill rate.