Nvidia Titan Xp vs Radeon R7 260X

Intro

Compare those specs to the Radeon R7 260X, which has a GPU core clock speed of 1100 MHz, and 2048 MB of GDDR5 memory running at 1625 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also is comprised of 896 SPUs, 56 TAUs, and 16 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

Nvidia Titan Xp		27938 points
Radeon R7 260X		4381 points
	Difference: 23557 (538%)

Zcash Mining Hash Rate

Nvidia Titan Xp		810 Sol/s
Radeon R7 260X		95 Sol/s
	Difference: 715 (753%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon R7 260X		115 Watts
Nvidia Titan Xp		250 Watts
	Difference: 135 Watts (117%)

Memory Bandwidth

The Nvidia Titan Xp should theoretically perform a lot faster than the Radeon R7 260X in general. (explain)

Nvidia Titan Xp		560845 MB/sec
Radeon R7 260X		104000 MB/sec
	Difference: 456845 (439%)

Texel Rate

The Nvidia Titan Xp will be quite a bit (approximately 516%) faster with regards to texture filtering than the Radeon R7 260X. (explain)

Nvidia Titan Xp		379680 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R7 260X		61600 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 318080 (516%)

Pixel Rate

The Nvidia Titan Xp is a lot (approximately 763%) faster with regards to anti-aliasing than the Radeon R7 260X, and able to handle higher screen resolutions more effectively. (explain)

Nvidia Titan Xp		151872 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R7 260X		17600 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 134272 (763%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the maximum amount of information (in units of MB per second) that can be transported past the external memory interface in a second. It is worked out by multiplying the interface width by its memory clock speed. In the case of DDR type RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied in one second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the video card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics chip could possibly record to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the amount of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel rate also depends on quite a few other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.