Nvidia Titan Xp vs Radeon R7 360

Intro

Compare those specs to the Radeon R7 360, which comes with clock speeds of 1050 MHz on the GPU, and 1625 MHz on the 2048 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 768 SPUs along with 48 TAUs and 16 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

Nvidia Titan Xp		27938 points
Radeon R7 360		4110 points
	Difference: 23828 (580%)

Zcash Mining Hash Rate

Nvidia Titan Xp		810 Sol/s
Radeon R7 360		98 Sol/s
	Difference: 712 (727%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon R7 360		100 Watts
Nvidia Titan Xp		250 Watts
	Difference: 150 Watts (150%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the Nvidia Titan Xp should be 439% quicker than the Radeon R7 360 in general, because of its greater data rate. (explain)

Nvidia Titan Xp		560845 MB/sec
Radeon R7 360		104000 MB/sec
	Difference: 456845 (439%)

Texel Rate

The Nvidia Titan Xp should be much (more or less 653%) better at texture filtering than the Radeon R7 360. (explain)

Nvidia Titan Xp		379680 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R7 360		50400 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 329280 (653%)

Pixel Rate

The Nvidia Titan Xp is quite a bit (approximately 804%) more effective at anti-aliasing than the Radeon R7 360, and also will be able to handle higher screen resolutions while still performing well. (explain)

Nvidia Titan Xp		151872 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R7 360		16800 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 135072 (804%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of information (counted in MB per second) that can be moved over the external memory interface in one second. The number is worked out by multiplying the interface width by its memory clock speed. In the case of DDR type memory, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed per second. This number is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the graphics card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics chip could possibly write to the local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the amount of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.