GeForce GTX 965M vs Nvidia Titan Xp

Intro

Compare all that to the Nvidia Titan Xp, which features a core clock speed of 1582 MHz and a GDDR5X memory speed of 1426 MHz. It also uses a 384-bit bus, and makes use of a 16 nm design. It features 3840 SPUs, 240 TAUs, and 96 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

Nvidia Titan Xp		27938 points
GeForce GTX 965M		5650 points
	Difference: 22288 (394%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 965M		60 Watts
Nvidia Titan Xp		250 Watts
	Difference: 190 Watts (317%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically, the Nvidia Titan Xp should perform a lot faster than the GeForce GTX 965M overall. (explain)

Nvidia Titan Xp		560845 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 965M		64000 MB/sec
	Difference: 496845 (776%)

Texel Rate

The Nvidia Titan Xp should be much (approximately 528%) better at anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GTX 965M. (explain)

Nvidia Titan Xp		379680 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 965M		60416 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 319264 (528%)

Pixel Rate

The Nvidia Titan Xp is much (more or less 403%) faster with regards to FSAA than the GeForce GTX 965M, and will be able to handle higher resolutions while still performing well. (explain)

Nvidia Titan Xp		151872 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 965M		30208 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 121664 (403%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of data (counted in megabytes per second) that can be moved over the external memory interface in one second. It is calculated by multiplying the interface width by the speed of its memory. If the card has DDR type RAM, it must be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that can be applied in one second. This number is calculated by multiplying the total texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels that the graphics card can possibly write to the local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is calculated by multiplying the amount of ROPs by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel rate also depends on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the max fill rate.