Nvidia Titan Xp vs Radeon RX 460 2GB

Intro

Compare those specifications to the Radeon RX 460 2GB, which makes use of a 14 nm design. AMD has clocked the core speed at 1090 MHz. The GDDR5 RAM works at a frequency of 1750 MHz on this specific model. It features 896 SPUs along with 56 Texture Address Units and 16 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

Zcash Mining Hash Rate

Nvidia Titan Xp		810 Sol/s
Radeon RX 460 2GB		117 Sol/s
	Difference: 693 (592%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon RX 460 2GB		75 Watts
Nvidia Titan Xp		250 Watts
	Difference: 175 Watts (233%)

Memory Bandwidth

Performance-wise, the Nvidia Titan Xp should theoretically be quite a bit superior to the Radeon RX 460 2GB in general. (explain)

Nvidia Titan Xp		560845 MB/sec
Radeon RX 460 2GB		112000 MB/sec
	Difference: 448845 (401%)

Texel Rate

The Nvidia Titan Xp is much (more or less 522%) faster with regards to texture filtering than the Radeon RX 460 2GB. (explain)

Nvidia Titan Xp		379680 Mtexels/sec
Radeon RX 460 2GB		61040 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 318640 (522%)

Pixel Rate

The Nvidia Titan Xp should be much (about 771%) better at full screen anti-aliasing than the Radeon RX 460 2GB, and also should be capable of handling higher screen resolutions more effectively. (explain)

Nvidia Titan Xp		151872 Mpixels/sec
Radeon RX 460 2GB		17440 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 134432 (771%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of data (measured in MB per second) that can be transported past the external memory interface within a second. It is calculated by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory clock speed. If the card has DDR type RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed per second. This number is calculated by multiplying the total texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics chip could possibly record to the local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is worked out by multiplying the amount of colour ROPs by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on many other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the maximum fill rate.