Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GT 430 vs Radeon R9 Nano

Intro

The GeForce GT 430 features a GPU core speed of 700 MHz, and the 512 MB of GDDR3 memory is set to run at 900 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also is made up of 96 Stream Processors, 16 TAUs, and 4 ROPs.

Compare that to the Radeon R9 Nano, which features a clock frequency of 1000 MHz and a HBM memory frequency of 500 MHz. It also uses a 4096-bit bus, and makes use of a 28 nm design. It is comprised of 4096 SPUs, 256 Texture Address Units, and 64 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GT 430 60 Watts
Radeon R9 Nano 175 Watts
Difference: 115 Watts (192%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the Radeon R9 Nano should perform a lot faster than the GeForce GT 430 overall. (explain)

Radeon R9 Nano 512000 MB/sec
GeForce GT 430 28800 MB/sec
Difference: 483200 (1678%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R9 Nano is a lot (about 2186%) more effective at AF than the GeForce GT 430. (explain)

Radeon R9 Nano 256000 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GT 430 11200 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 244800 (2186%)

Pixel Rate

If using a high screen resolution is important to you, then the Radeon R9 Nano is the winner, by far. (explain)

Radeon R9 Nano 64000 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GT 430 2800 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 61200 (2186%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 430

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 Nano

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GT 430 Radeon R9 Nano
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year October 2010 September 2015
Code Name GF108 Fiji XT
Memory 512 MB 4096 MB
Core Speed 700 MHz 1000 MHz
Memory Speed 1800 MHz 500 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 60 watts 175 watts
Bandwidth 28800 MB/sec 512000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 11200 Mtexels/sec 256000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 2800 Mpixels/sec 64000 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 96 4096
Texture Mapping Units 16 256
Render Output Units 4 64
Bus Type GDDR3 HBM
Bus Width 128-bit 4096-bit
Fab Process 40 nm 28 nm
Transistors 585 million 8900 million
Bus PCIe x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 11 DirectX 12.0
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.1 OpenGL 4.5

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the maximum amount of data (counted in megabytes per second) that can be moved across the external memory interface in one second. The number is calculated by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory speed. If the card has DDR memory, it must be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed per second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total amount of texture units by the core speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the video card can possibly write to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is calculated by multiplying the number of ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel output rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 430

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 Nano

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield