Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce 810M vs Radeon R9 270X

Intro

The GeForce 810M features core clock speeds of 738 MHz on the GPU, and 900 MHz on the 1024 MB of DDR3 memory. It features 48 SPUs as well as 8 TAUs and 4 ROPs.

Compare those specifications to the Radeon R9 270X, which has a clock frequency of 1000 MHz and a GDDR5 memory frequency of 1400 MHz. It also makes use of a 256-bit bus, and uses a 28 nm design. It is comprised of 1280 SPUs, 80 TAUs, and 32 Raster Operation Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce 810M 15 Watts
Radeon R9 270X 180 Watts
Difference: 165 Watts (1100%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the Radeon R9 270X should perform quite a bit faster than the GeForce 810M in general. (explain)

Radeon R9 270X 179200 MB/sec
GeForce 810M 14400 MB/sec
Difference: 164800 (1144%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R9 270X will be quite a bit (about 1255%) more effective at anisotropic filtering than the GeForce 810M. (explain)

Radeon R9 270X 80000 Mtexels/sec
GeForce 810M 5904 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 74096 (1255%)

Pixel Rate

If running with high levels of AA is important to you, then the Radeon R9 270X is the winner, and very much so. (explain)

Radeon R9 270X 32000 Mpixels/sec
GeForce 810M 2952 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 29048 (984%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce 810M

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 270X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce 810M Radeon R9 270X
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year February 2014 October 2013
Code Name GF117 Curacao XT
Memory 1024 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 738 MHz 1000 MHz
Memory Speed 1800 MHz 5600 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 15 watts 180 watts
Bandwidth 14400 MB/sec 179200 MB/sec
Texel Rate 5904 Mtexels/sec 80000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 2952 Mpixels/sec 32000 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 48 1280
Texture Mapping Units 8 80
Render Output Units 4 32
Bus Type DDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 64-bit 256-bit
Fab Process 28 nm 28 nm
Transistors (Unknown) million 2800 million
Bus PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 12 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.5 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of information (measured in MB per second) that can be moved across the external memory interface within a second. It is worked out by multiplying the interface width by its memory speed. If it uses DDR type RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that are applied in one second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the graphics card can possibly record to the local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the number of Render Output Units by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate also depends on many other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the maximum fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce 810M

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 270X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield