GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Radeon R7 260X

Intro

Compare those specs to the Radeon R7 260X, which features clock speeds of 1100 MHz on the GPU, and 1625 MHz on the 2048 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 896 SPUs as well as 56 TAUs and 16 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

GeForce GTX 980 Ti		17120 points
Radeon R7 260X		4381 points
	Difference: 12739 (291%)

Zcash Mining Hash Rate

GeForce GTX 980 Ti		425 Sol/s
Radeon R7 260X		95 Sol/s
	Difference: 330 (347%)

Ethereum Mining Hash Rate

GeForce GTX 980 Ti		22 Mh/s
Radeon R7 260X		14 Mh/s
	Difference: 8 (57%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon R7 260X		115 Watts
GeForce GTX 980 Ti		250 Watts
	Difference: 135 Watts (117%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the GeForce GTX 980 Ti should be a lot faster than the Radeon R7 260X overall. (explain)

GeForce GTX 980 Ti		336000 MB/sec
Radeon R7 260X		104000 MB/sec
	Difference: 232000 (223%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is quite a bit (approximately 186%) better at texture filtering than the Radeon R7 260X. (explain)

GeForce GTX 980 Ti		176000 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R7 260X		61600 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 114400 (186%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is a lot (about 445%) faster with regards to AA than the Radeon R7 260X, and also able to handle higher screen resolutions while still performing well. (explain)

GeForce GTX 980 Ti		96000 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R7 260X		17600 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 78400 (445%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the maximum amount of information (measured in MB per second) that can be moved over the external memory interface in one second. It's worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory clock speed. In the case of DDR type memory, it must be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are processed in one second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the video card can possibly write to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the number of colour ROPs by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the max fill rate.