 |
 |
GeForce GTX 970 vs Radeon R9 280
Intro
The GeForce GTX 970 features core clock speeds of 1050 MHz on the GPU, and 1750 MHz on the 4096 MB of GDDR5 RAM. It features 1664 SPUs as well as 104 TAUs and 64 Rasterization Operator Units.Compare that to the Radeon R9 280, which comes with GPU clock speed of 933 MHz, and 3072 MB of GDDR5 RAM set to run at 1250 MHz through a 384-bit bus. It also features 1792 Stream Processors, 112 Texture Address Units, and 32 Raster Operation Units.
Benchmarks
These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score
| GeForce GTX 970 |
|
10867 points |
| Radeon R9 280 |
|
7961 points |
|
|
Zcash Mining Hash Rate
| GeForce GTX 970 |
|
262 Sol/s |
| Radeon R9 280 |
|
183 Sol/s |
|
|
Ethereum Mining Hash Rate
| Radeon R9 280 |
|
22 Mh/s |
| GeForce GTX 970 |
|
19 Mh/s |
|
|
Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks
Power Consumption (Max TDP)
| GeForce GTX 970 |
|
145 Watts |
| Radeon R9 280 |
|
250 Watts |
|
|
Memory Bandwidth
Theoretically speaking, the Radeon R9 280 should be 7% faster than the GeForce GTX 970 overall, because of its greater bandwidth. (explain)
| Radeon R9 280 |
|
240000 MB/sec |
| GeForce GTX 970 |
|
224000 MB/sec |
|
|
Texel Rate
The GeForce GTX 970 will be just a bit (approximately 5%) more effective at anisotropic filtering than the Radeon R9 280. (explain)| GeForce GTX 970 |
|
109200 Mtexels/sec |
| Radeon R9 280 |
|
104496 Mtexels/sec |
|
|
Pixel Rate
The GeForce GTX 970 is a lot (about 125%) better at full screen anti-aliasing than the Radeon R9 280, and also will be capable of handling higher screen resolutions while still performing well. (explain)| GeForce GTX 970 |
|
67200 Mpixels/sec |
| Radeon R9 280 |
|
29856 Mpixels/sec |
|
|
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.
Price Comparison
GeForce GTX 970Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Radeon R9 280Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
Specifications
| Model | GeForce GTX 970 | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | nVidia | AMD |
| Year | September 2014 | March 2014 |
| Code Name | GM204-200 | Tahiti Pro |
| Memory | 4096 MB | 3072 MB |
| Core Speed | 1050 MHz | 933 MHz |
| Memory Speed | 7000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Power (Max TDP) | 145 watts | 250 watts |
| Bandwidth | 224000 MB/sec | 240000 MB/sec |
| Texel Rate | 109200 Mtexels/sec | 104496 Mtexels/sec |
| Pixel Rate | 67200 Mpixels/sec | 29856 Mpixels/sec |
| Unified Shaders | 1664 | 1792 |
| Texture Mapping Units | 104 | 112 |
| Render Output Units | 64 | 32 |
| Bus Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 5200 million | 4313 million |
| Bus | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| DirectX Version | DirectX 11.2 | DirectX 11.2 |
| OpenGL Version | OpenGL 4.5 | OpenGL 4.3 |
Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of information (counted in MB per second) that can be transferred over the external memory interface within a second. The number is worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by the speed of its memory. If the card has DDR type memory, it must be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and high resolutions.
Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed in one second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied per second.
Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the graphics card could possibly record to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is calculated by multiplying the amount of Render Output Units by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the maximum fill rate.
GeForce GTX 970Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Radeon R9 280Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
|
Comments
2 Responses to “GeForce GTX 970 vs Radeon R9 280”So, these two cards are pretty much the same, exept at higher resolutions. I got my r9 280 at $130 after Mail in rebate, making it so that you could get three of these for a little bit more than one of the 970's. Wow.
No, you can't compare them. The GTX 970 is faster than a R9 290 and takes only a bit over half the power and is also much cooler. Also, the GTX 970 has a 'real world bandwidth' of ~300 GB/sec, what would be ~25% more - it has this compression technique like the new R9 285, just much better. The Texel Rate isn't really important, because even graphics cards years ago didn't have problems with AF anymore - you can try it yourself: Let the game run with 16xAF and then let it run with 4xAF - almost no performance difference but much cleaner picture...
I've had the Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X and now I'm upgrading to a GTX 970. It's a big difference, not only a small. YOu can throw EVERY game on it with MAX details at 1080p and you'll get stable 60fps... On some older games you can even downsample or run at 4K, like Mirror's Edge. With my R9 280 I sometimes didn't even get 60fps with High Settings @ 1080p and 4xMSAA.