 |
 |
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Intro
The GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 features a GPU core clock speed of 576 MHz, and the 896 MB of GDDR3 memory runs at 999 MHz through a 448-bit bus. It also is comprised of 216 SPUs, 72 TAUs, and 28 Raster Operation Units.Compare those specifications to the GeForce GTX 750 Ti, which uses a 28 nm design. nVidia has set the core speed at 1020 MHz. The GDDR5 RAM runs at a frequency of 1350 MHz on this card. It features 640 SPUs along with 40 Texture Address Units and 16 ROPs.
Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks
Power Consumption (Max TDP)
| GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|
60 Watts |
| GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 |
|
202 Watts |
|
|
Memory Bandwidth
Theoretically speaking, the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 will be 30% faster than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti overall, because of its higher data rate. (explain)
| GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 |
|
111888 MB/sec |
| GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|
86400 MB/sec |
|
|
Texel Rate
The GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 is a bit (approximately 2%) faster with regards to AF than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti. (explain)| GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 |
|
41472 Mtexels/sec |
| GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|
40800 Mtexels/sec |
|
|
Pixel Rate
If running with a high resolution is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 750 Ti is the winner, but only just. (explain)| GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|
16320 Mpixels/sec |
| GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 |
|
16128 Mpixels/sec |
|
|
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.
Price Comparison
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
GeForce GTX 750 TiAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
Specifications
| Model | GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 | GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | nVidia | nVidia |
| Year | September 16, 2008 | February 2014 |
| Code Name | G200 | GM107 |
| Memory | 896 MB | 2048 MB |
| Core Speed | 576 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Memory Speed | 1998 MHz | 5400 MHz |
| Power (Max TDP) | 202 watts | 60 watts |
| Bandwidth | 111888 MB/sec | 86400 MB/sec |
| Texel Rate | 41472 Mtexels/sec | 40800 Mtexels/sec |
| Pixel Rate | 16128 Mpixels/sec | 16320 Mpixels/sec |
| Unified Shaders | 216 | 640 |
| Texture Mapping Units | 72 | 40 |
| Render Output Units | 28 | 16 |
| Bus Type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 448-bit | 128-bit |
| Fab Process | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 1400 million | 1870 million |
| Bus | PCIe x16 2.0 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| DirectX Version | DirectX 10 | DirectX 11.0 |
| OpenGL Version | OpenGL 3.1 | OpenGL 4.4 |
Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of data (measured in megabytes per second) that can be transported over the external memory interface in one second. The number is calculated by multiplying the bus width by its memory speed. If it uses DDR RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.
Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed in one second. This number is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in one second.
Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels the graphics card could possibly write to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is worked out by multiplying the number of ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel output rate also depends on quite a few other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
GeForce GTX 750 TiAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
|
Comments
One Response to “GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti”GTX260-216 *typically* has core speed of 630MHz and memory speed of 2126MHz. The figures above are *stock* speeds for the GTX260.