Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 275 vs Radeon R9 280X

Intro

The GeForce GTX 275 uses a 55 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core frequency at 633 MHz. The GDDR3 RAM is set to run at a speed of 1134 MHz on this particular model. It features 240 SPUs along with 80 TAUs and 28 ROPs.

Compare all of that to the Radeon R9 280X, which features core clock speeds of 850 MHz on the GPU, and 1500 MHz on the 3072 MB of GDDR5 RAM. It features 2048 SPUs along with 128 TAUs and 32 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 275 219 Watts
Radeon R9 280X 250 Watts
Difference: 31 Watts (14%)

Memory Bandwidth

Performance-wise, the Radeon R9 280X should theoretically be quite a bit superior to the GeForce GTX 275 in general. (explain)

Radeon R9 280X 288000 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 275 127008 MB/sec
Difference: 160992 (127%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R9 280X will be much (approximately 115%) faster with regards to AF than the GeForce GTX 275. (explain)

Radeon R9 280X 108800 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 275 50640 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 58160 (115%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon R9 280X should be a lot (about 53%) faster with regards to AA than the GeForce GTX 275, and should be capable of handling higher screen resolutions more effectively. (explain)

Radeon R9 280X 27200 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 275 17724 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 9476 (53%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 275

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 280X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 275 Radeon R9 280X
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year April 9, 2009 October 2013
Code Name G200b Tahiti XTL
Memory 896 MB 3072 MB
Core Speed 633 MHz 850 MHz
Memory Speed 2268 MHz 6000 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 219 watts 250 watts
Bandwidth 127008 MB/sec 288000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 50640 Mtexels/sec 108800 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 17724 Mpixels/sec 27200 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 240 2048
Texture Mapping Units 80 128
Render Output Units 28 32
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 448-bit 384-bit
Fab Process 55 nm 28 nm
Transistors 1400 million 4313 million
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of data (counted in megabytes per second) that can be transported over the external memory interface in one second. It's calculated by multiplying the card's bus width by the speed of its memory. If the card has DDR type RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that can be applied in one second. This is worked out by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the graphics card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics chip could possibly record to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is worked out by multiplying the number of colour ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate also depends on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the maximum fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 275

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 280X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield