Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm vs Radeon R7 250

Intro

The GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm has clock speeds of 576 MHz on the GPU, and 999 MHz on the 896 MB of GDDR3 memory. It features 216 SPUs along with 72 TAUs and 28 ROPs.

Compare all of that to the Radeon R7 250, which features GPU clock speed of 1000 MHz, and 1024 MB of GDDR5 RAM running at 1150 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also is made up of 384 SPUs, 24 Texture Address Units, and 8 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon R7 250 65 Watts
GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm 171 Watts
Difference: 106 Watts (163%)

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm should perform much faster than the Radeon R7 250 overall. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm 111888 MB/sec
Radeon R7 250 73600 MB/sec
Difference: 38288 (52%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm should be much (about 73%) more effective at AF than the Radeon R7 250. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm 41472 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R7 250 24000 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 17472 (73%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm is a lot (more or less 102%) better at FSAA than the Radeon R7 250, and able to handle higher resolutions while still performing well. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm 16128 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R7 250 8000 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 8128 (102%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 250

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm Radeon R7 250
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year December 22, 2008 October 2013
Code Name G200b Oland XT
Memory 896 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 576 MHz 1000 MHz
Memory Speed 1998 MHz 4600 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 171 watts 65 watts
Bandwidth 111888 MB/sec 73600 MB/sec
Texel Rate 41472 Mtexels/sec 24000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 16128 Mpixels/sec 8000 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 216 384
Texture Mapping Units 72 24
Render Output Units 28 8
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 448-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 55 nm 28 nm
Transistors 1400 million 1040 million
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of information (counted in MB per second) that can be transferred past the external memory interface in one second. It is calculated by multiplying the bus width by its memory clock speed. In the case of DDR RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that can be applied in one second. This is worked out by multiplying the total amount of texture units by the core speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics card can possibly write to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is worked out by multiplying the number of colour ROPs by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate also depends on quite a few other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the maximum fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 250

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield