Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GT 210 vs Radeon R7 250

Intro

The GeForce GT 210 has core speeds of 589 MHz on the GPU, and 800 MHz on the 512 MB of DDR3 memory. It features 16 SPUs along with 8 Texture Address Units and 4 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare that to the Radeon R7 250, which uses a 28 nm design. AMD has set the core frequency at 1000 MHz. The GDDR5 RAM works at a speed of 1150 MHz on this particular model. It features 384 SPUs as well as 24 TAUs and 8 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GT 210 31 Watts
Radeon R7 250 65 Watts
Difference: 34 Watts (110%)

Memory Bandwidth

Performance-wise, the Radeon R7 250 should theoretically be quite a bit better than the GeForce GT 210 in general. (explain)

Radeon R7 250 73600 MB/sec
GeForce GT 210 12800 MB/sec
Difference: 60800 (475%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R7 250 should be a lot (about 409%) better at texture filtering than the GeForce GT 210. (explain)

Radeon R7 250 24000 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GT 210 4712 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 19288 (409%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon R7 250 is quite a bit (approximately 240%) faster with regards to anti-aliasing than the GeForce GT 210, and also should be able to handle higher screen resolutions more effectively. (explain)

Radeon R7 250 8000 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GT 210 2356 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 5644 (240%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 210

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 250

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GT 210 Radeon R7 250
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year October 2009 October 2013
Code Name GT218 Oland XT
Memory 512 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 589 MHz 1000 MHz
Memory Speed 1600 MHz 4600 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 31 watts 65 watts
Bandwidth 12800 MB/sec 73600 MB/sec
Texel Rate 4712 Mtexels/sec 24000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 2356 Mpixels/sec 8000 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 16 384
Texture Mapping Units 8 24
Render Output Units 4 8
Bus Type DDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 64-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 40 nm 28 nm
Transistors 260 million 1040 million
Bus PCIe 2.0 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10.1 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.2 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of information (measured in megabytes per second) that can be transferred across the external memory interface within a second. It is calculated by multiplying the card's interface width by the speed of its memory. In the case of DDR memory, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are applied per second. This is worked out by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the video card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels that the graphics card could possibly write to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is calculated by multiplying the amount of Render Output Units by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel output rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the maximum fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 210

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 250

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield