Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm vs Radeon R7 240

Intro

The GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm has a GPU core speed of 576 MHz, and the 896 MB of GDDR3 memory is set to run at 999 MHz through a 448-bit bus. It also features 216 SPUs, 72 TAUs, and 28 ROPs.

Compare all of that to the Radeon R7 240, which has core clock speeds of 730 MHz on the GPU, and 900 MHz on the 2048 MB of DDR3 RAM. It features 320 SPUs as well as 20 TAUs and 8 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon R7 240 30 Watts
GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm 171 Watts
Difference: 141 Watts (470%)

Memory Bandwidth

Performance-wise, the GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm should theoretically be much superior to the Radeon R7 240 in general. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm 111888 MB/sec
Radeon R7 240 28800 MB/sec
Difference: 83088 (289%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm is a lot (about 184%) better at texture filtering than the Radeon R7 240. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm 41472 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R7 240 14600 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 26872 (184%)

Pixel Rate

If running with a high screen resolution is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm is the winner, and very much so. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm 16128 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R7 240 5840 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 10288 (176%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 240

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm Radeon R7 240
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year December 22, 2008 October 2013
Code Name G200b Oland PRO
Memory 896 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 576 MHz 730 MHz
Memory Speed 1998 MHz 1800 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 171 watts 30 watts
Bandwidth 111888 MB/sec 28800 MB/sec
Texel Rate 41472 Mtexels/sec 14600 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 16128 Mpixels/sec 5840 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 216 320
Texture Mapping Units 72 20
Render Output Units 28 8
Bus Type GDDR3 DDR3
Bus Width 448-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 55 nm 28 nm
Transistors 1400 million 1040 million
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of data (measured in MB per second) that can be transferred past the external memory interface in one second. It's calculated by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory speed. If it uses DDR RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the card's memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are processed in one second. This is worked out by multiplying the total texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the graphics card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the graphics card can possibly write to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is worked out by multiplying the number of Render Output Units by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel fill rate also depends on quite a few other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 240

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield