Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs Radeon R7 240

Intro

The GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 has a GPU core clock speed of 576 MHz, and the 896 MB of GDDR3 memory is set to run at 999 MHz through a 448-bit bus. It also is made up of 216 SPUs, 72 TAUs, and 28 ROPs.

Compare all of that to the Radeon R7 240, which has a clock speed of 730 MHz and a DDR3 memory frequency of 900 MHz. It also uses a 128-bit bus, and makes use of a 28 nm design. It is made up of 320 SPUs, 20 TAUs, and 8 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon R7 240 30 Watts
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 202 Watts
Difference: 172 Watts (573%)

Memory Bandwidth

The GeForce GTX 260 Core 216, in theory, should perform a lot faster than the Radeon R7 240 overall. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 111888 MB/sec
Radeon R7 240 28800 MB/sec
Difference: 83088 (289%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 is quite a bit (more or less 184%) better at AF than the Radeon R7 240. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 41472 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R7 240 14600 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 26872 (184%)

Pixel Rate

If using high levels of AA is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 is a better choice, by a large margin. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 16128 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R7 240 5840 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 10288 (176%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 240

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Radeon R7 240
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year September 16, 2008 October 2013
Code Name G200 Oland PRO
Memory 896 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 576 MHz 730 MHz
Memory Speed 1998 MHz 1800 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 202 watts 30 watts
Bandwidth 111888 MB/sec 28800 MB/sec
Texel Rate 41472 Mtexels/sec 14600 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 16128 Mpixels/sec 5840 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 216 320
Texture Mapping Units 72 20
Render Output Units 28 8
Bus Type GDDR3 DDR3
Bus Width 448-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 65 nm 28 nm
Transistors 1400 million 1040 million
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of information (counted in MB per second) that can be transported over the external memory interface in a second. The number is calculated by multiplying the interface width by the speed of its memory. If it uses DDR memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are processed per second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units by the core speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels that the graphics chip could possibly write to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is calculated by multiplying the amount of colour ROPs by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel output rate also depends on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 240

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield