 |
 |
Radeon HD 6950 2GB vs Radeon R7 240
Intro
The Radeon HD 6950 2GB comes with a core clock frequency of 800 MHz and a GDDR5 memory frequency of 1250 MHz. It also makes use of a 256-bit memory bus, and uses a 40 nm design. It is comprised of 1408 SPUs, 88 Texture Address Units, and 32 Raster Operation Units.Compare those specifications to the Radeon R7 240, which uses a 28 nm design. AMD has set the core speed at 730 MHz. The DDR3 memory runs at a frequency of 900 MHz on this specific model. It features 320 SPUs along with 20 Texture Address Units and 8 ROPs.
Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks
Power Consumption (Max TDP)
| Radeon R7 240 |
|
30 Watts |
| Radeon HD 6950 2GB |
|
200 Watts |
|
|
Memory Bandwidth
The Radeon HD 6950 2GB should theoretically perform much faster than the Radeon R7 240 in general. (explain)
| Radeon HD 6950 2GB |
|
160000 MB/sec |
| Radeon R7 240 |
|
28800 MB/sec |
|
|
Texel Rate
The Radeon HD 6950 2GB will be a lot (approximately 382%) better at anisotropic filtering than the Radeon R7 240. (explain)| Radeon HD 6950 2GB |
|
70400 Mtexels/sec |
| Radeon R7 240 |
|
14600 Mtexels/sec |
|
|
Pixel Rate
If using high levels of AA is important to you, then the Radeon HD 6950 2GB is superior to the Radeon R7 240, by far. (explain)| Radeon HD 6950 2GB |
|
25600 Mpixels/sec |
| Radeon R7 240 |
|
5840 Mpixels/sec |
|
|
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.
Price Comparison
Radeon HD 6950 2GBAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Radeon R7 240Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
Specifications
| Model | Radeon HD 6950 2GB | Radeon R7 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
| Year | December 2010 | October 2013 |
| Code Name | Cayman Pro | Oland PRO |
| Memory | 2048 MB | 2048 MB |
| Core Speed | 800 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Memory Speed | 5000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Power (Max TDP) | 200 watts | 30 watts |
| Bandwidth | 160000 MB/sec | 28800 MB/sec |
| Texel Rate | 70400 Mtexels/sec | 14600 Mtexels/sec |
| Pixel Rate | 25600 Mpixels/sec | 5840 Mpixels/sec |
| Unified Shaders | 1408 | 320 |
| Texture Mapping Units | 88 | 20 |
| Render Output Units | 32 | 8 |
| Bus Type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 128-bit |
| Fab Process | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 2640 million | 1040 million |
| Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| DirectX Version | DirectX 11 | DirectX 11.2 |
| OpenGL Version | OpenGL 4.1 | OpenGL 4.3 |
Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of data (measured in megabytes per second) that can be moved over the external memory interface in one second. It's worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory clock speed. In the case of DDR RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the card's memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and higher screen resolutions.
Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied per second. This is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the graphics card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in a second.
Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the video card could possibly record to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is calculated by multiplying the amount of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.
Radeon HD 6950 2GBAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Radeon R7 240Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
|
Comments
Be the first to leave a comment!