GeForce GTX Titan vs Geforce GTX 760

Intro

Compare all of that to the Geforce GTX 760, which has a core clock frequency of 980 MHz and a GDDR5 memory frequency of 1502 MHz. It also uses a 256-bit bus, and uses a 28 nm design. It is made up of 1152 SPUs, 96 Texture Address Units, and 32 Raster Operation Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

GeForce GTX Titan		10162 points
Geforce GTX 760		5923 points
	Difference: 4239 (72%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Geforce GTX 760		170 Watts
GeForce GTX Titan		250 Watts
	Difference: 80 Watts (47%)

Memory Bandwidth

Performance-wise, the GeForce GTX Titan should in theory be a lot superior to the Geforce GTX 760 in general. (explain)

GeForce GTX Titan		288384 MB/sec
Geforce GTX 760		192256 MB/sec
	Difference: 96128 (50%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX Titan is a lot (about 99%) faster with regards to AF than the Geforce GTX 760. (explain)

GeForce GTX Titan		187488 Mtexels/sec
Geforce GTX 760		94080 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 93408 (99%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX Titan should be a lot (about 28%) faster with regards to FSAA than the Geforce GTX 760, and also able to handle higher resolutions without slowing down too much. (explain)

GeForce GTX Titan		40176 Mpixels/sec
Geforce GTX 760		31360 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 8816 (28%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of data (counted in MB per second) that can be transferred over the external memory interface in a second. The number is calculated by multiplying the bus width by the speed of its memory. If the card has DDR memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied per second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics chip could possibly write to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is worked out by multiplying the amount of colour ROPs by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel rate also depends on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the maximum fill rate.