GeForce GTX Titan vs Geforce GTX 760

Intro

Compare all that to the Geforce GTX 760, which makes use of a 28 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core speed at 980 MHz. The GDDR5 memory is set to run at a speed of 1502 MHz on this particular card. It features 1152 SPUs as well as 96 Texture Address Units and 32 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

GeForce GTX Titan		10162 points
Geforce GTX 760		5923 points
	Difference: 4239 (72%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Geforce GTX 760		170 Watts
GeForce GTX Titan		250 Watts
	Difference: 80 Watts (47%)

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the GeForce GTX Titan should be 50% faster than the Geforce GTX 760 overall, due to its greater data rate. (explain)

GeForce GTX Titan		288384 MB/sec
Geforce GTX 760		192256 MB/sec
	Difference: 96128 (50%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX Titan should be quite a bit (approximately 99%) more effective at AF than the Geforce GTX 760. (explain)

GeForce GTX Titan		187488 Mtexels/sec
Geforce GTX 760		94080 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 93408 (99%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX Titan should be quite a bit (about 28%) more effective at anti-aliasing than the Geforce GTX 760, and also able to handle higher resolutions while still performing well. (explain)

GeForce GTX Titan		40176 Mpixels/sec
Geforce GTX 760		31360 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 8816 (28%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of data (counted in MB per second) that can be transferred past the external memory interface in one second. It is calculated by multiplying the interface width by its memory speed. In the case of DDR memory, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed in one second. This is calculated by multiplying the total amount of texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics chip can possibly write to the local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is worked out by multiplying the amount of colour ROPs by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel rate also depends on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the max fill rate.