GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Intro

Compare those specifications to the GeForce GTX 650 Ti, which comes with core clock speeds of 928 MHz on the GPU, and 1350 MHz on the 1024 MB of GDDR5 RAM. It features 768 SPUs along with 64 Texture Address Units and 16 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 650 Ti		110 Watts
GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm		171 Watts
	Difference: 61 Watts (55%)

Memory Bandwidth

The GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm should theoretically be a lot faster than the GeForce GTX 650 Ti in general. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm		111888 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 650 Ti		86400 MB/sec
	Difference: 25488 (30%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti will be a lot (approximately 43%) better at AF than the GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm. (explain)

GeForce GTX 650 Ti		59392 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm		41472 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 17920 (43%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm should be a bit (about 9%) better at full screen anti-aliasing than the GeForce GTX 650 Ti, and will be capable of handling higher screen resolutions more effectively. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm		16128 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 650 Ti		14848 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 1280 (9%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of information (counted in MB per second) that can be transferred past the external memory interface in a second. The number is calculated by multiplying the interface width by its memory speed. In the case of DDR type RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed in one second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics chip could possibly record to the local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the amount of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the max fill rate.