Compare any two Solid State Drives:


Crucial BX500 960GB vs MX200 250MB

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Specification Charts


BX500 960GB 1024 GB
MX200 250MB 250 GB
Difference: 774 (310%)

Random Read

BX500 960GB N/A IOPS
MX200 250MB 100000 IOPS
Difference: -100000 (-100%)

Random Write

BX500 960GB N/A IOPS
MX200 250MB 87000 IOPS
Difference: -87000 (-100%)

Sequential Read

MX200 250MB 555 MB/sec
BX500 960GB 540 MB/sec
Difference: 15 (3%)

Sequential Write

BX500 960GB 500 MB/sec
MX200 250MB 500 MB/sec
Difference: 0 (0%)


BX500 960GB 240 TB
MX200 250MB 80 TB
Difference: 160 (200%)


Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model BX500 960GB MX200 250MB
Manufacturer Crucial Crucial
NAND Micron 64L TLC Micron 16nm 128Gbit MLC
Form Factor 2.5" SATA III 2.5"
Capacity 1024 GB 250 GB
Cache N/A MB 512 MB
Sequential Read 540 MB/s 555 MB/s
Sequential Write 500 MB/s 500 MB/s
Random Read N/A IOPS 100000 IOPS
Random Write N/A IOPS 87000 IOPS
Interface SATA III SATA III 6Gb/s
Controller Silicon Motion SM2258XT Marvell 88SS9189
Date Released 2019 2015
Endurance 240 TB 80 TB
Notes 3-Year Warranty TCG Opal 2.0 & IEEE-1667 (eDrive)

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

BX500 960GB

Check prices at:

MX200 250MB

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.