Compare any two Solid State Drives:

VS

Samsung 870 Evo 250GB vs SanDisk X400 512GB

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Specification Charts

Capacity

X400 512GB 512 GB
870 Evo 250GB 250 GB
Difference: 262 (105%)

Random Read

870 Evo 250GB 980000 IOPS
X400 512GB 93500 IOPS
Difference: 886500 (948%)

Random Write

870 Evo 250GB 88000 IOPS
X400 512GB 75000 IOPS
Difference: 13000 (17%)

Sequential Read

870 Evo 250GB 560 MB/sec
X400 512GB 540 MB/sec
Difference: 20 (4%)

Sequential Write

870 Evo 250GB 530 MB/sec
X400 512GB 520 MB/sec
Difference: 10 (2%)

Endurance

X400 512GB 160 TB
870 Evo 250GB 150 TB
Difference: 10 (7%)

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model 870 Evo 250GB X400 512GB
Manufacturer Samsung SanDisk
NAND Samsung 128L TLC TLC NAND
Form Factor 2.5" SATA III 2.5"
Capacity 250 GB 512 GB
Cache 256 MB (N/A) MB
Sequential Read 560 MB/s 540 MB/s
Sequential Write 530 MB/s 520 MB/s
Random Read 980000 IOPS 93500 IOPS
Random Write 88000 IOPS 75000 IOPS
Interface SATA III SATA III 6Gb/s
Controller Samsung MKX Metis Marvell 88SS1074
Date Released 2021 2016
Endurance 150 TB 160 TB
Notes 5-Year Warranty Warranty 5 years

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

870 Evo 250GB

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

X400 512GB

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.