Compare any two Solid State Drives:


Samsung 870 Evo 250GB vs Crucial BX500 480GB

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Specification Charts


BX500 480GB 512 GB
870 Evo 250GB 250 GB
Difference: 262 (105%)

Random Read

870 Evo 250GB 980000 IOPS
BX500 480GB (N/A) IOPS
Difference: 980000 (-100%)

Random Write

870 Evo 250GB 88000 IOPS
BX500 480GB (N/A) IOPS
Difference: 88000 (-100%)

Sequential Read

870 Evo 250GB 560 MB/sec
BX500 480GB 540 MB/sec
Difference: 20 (4%)

Sequential Write

870 Evo 250GB 530 MB/sec
BX500 480GB 500 MB/sec
Difference: 30 (6%)


870 Evo 250GB 150 TB
BX500 480GB 120 TB
Difference: 30 (25%)


Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model 870 Evo 250GB BX500 480GB
Manufacturer Samsung Crucial
NAND Samsung 128L TLC Micron 64L TLC
Form Factor 2.5" SATA III 2.5" SATA III
Capacity 250 GB 512 GB
Cache 256 MB (N/A) MB
Sequential Read 560 MB/s 540 MB/s
Sequential Write 530 MB/s 500 MB/s
Random Read 980000 IOPS (N/A) IOPS
Random Write 88000 IOPS (N/A) IOPS
Controller Samsung MKX Metis Silicon Motion SM2258XT
Date Released 2021 2019
Endurance 150 TB 120 TB
Notes 5-Year Warranty 3-Year Warranty

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

870 Evo 250GB

Check prices at:

BX500 480GB

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.