Compare any two Solid State Drives:


Kingston HyperX Savage 960GB vs Crucial MX200 250MB

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Specification Charts


HyperX Savage 960GB 960 GB
MX200 250MB 250 GB
Difference: 710 (284%)

Random Read

MX200 250MB 100000 IOPS
HyperX Savage 960GB 99000 IOPS
Difference: 1000 (1%)

Random Write

HyperX Savage 960GB 89000 IOPS
MX200 250MB 87000 IOPS
Difference: 2000 (2%)

Sequential Read

HyperX Savage 960GB 560 MB/sec
MX200 250MB 555 MB/sec
Difference: 5 (1%)

Sequential Write

HyperX Savage 960GB 530 MB/sec
MX200 250MB 500 MB/sec
Difference: 30 (6%)


HyperX Savage 960GB 681 TB
MX200 250MB 80 TB
Difference: 601 (751%)


Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model HyperX Savage 960GB MX200 250MB
Manufacturer Kingston Crucial
NAND Toshiba’s A19 64Gbit MLC Micron 16nm 128Gbit MLC
Form Factor 2.5" 2.5"
Capacity 960 GB 250 GB
Cache 256 MB 512 MB
Sequential Read 560 MB/s 555 MB/s
Sequential Write 530 MB/s 500 MB/s
Random Read 99000 IOPS 100000 IOPS
Random Write 89000 IOPS 87000 IOPS
Interface SATA III 6Gb/s SATA III 6Gb/s
Controller Phison PS3110-S10 Marvell 88SS9189
Date Released 2015 2015
Endurance 681 TB 80 TB
Notes Three-year warranty - 1 million hours MTBF TCG Opal 2.0 & IEEE-1667 (eDrive)

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

HyperX Savage 960GB

Check prices at:

MX200 250MB

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.