Compare any two Solid State Drives:


Samsung 870 Evo 250GB vs Kingston HyperX Savage 480GB

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Specification Charts


HyperX Savage 480GB 480 GB
870 Evo 250GB 250 GB
Difference: 230 (92%)

Random Read

870 Evo 250GB 980000 IOPS
HyperX Savage 480GB 100000 IOPS
Difference: 880000 (880%)

Random Write

870 Evo 250GB 88000 IOPS
HyperX Savage 480GB 88000 IOPS
Difference: 0 (0%)

Sequential Read

870 Evo 250GB 560 MB/sec
HyperX Savage 480GB 560 MB/sec
Difference: 0 (0%)

Sequential Write

870 Evo 250GB 530 MB/sec
HyperX Savage 480GB 530 MB/sec
Difference: 0 (0%)


HyperX Savage 480GB 416 TB
870 Evo 250GB 150 TB
Difference: 266 (177%)


Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model 870 Evo 250GB HyperX Savage 480GB
Manufacturer Samsung Kingston
NAND Samsung 128L TLC Toshiba’s A19 64Gbit MLC
Form Factor 2.5" SATA III 2.5"
Capacity 250 GB 480 GB
Cache 256 MB 256 MB
Sequential Read 560 MB/s 560 MB/s
Sequential Write 530 MB/s 530 MB/s
Random Read 980000 IOPS 100000 IOPS
Random Write 88000 IOPS 88000 IOPS
Interface SATA III SATA III 6Gb/s
Controller Samsung MKX Metis Phison PS3110-S10
Date Released 2021 2015
Endurance 150 TB 416 TB
Notes 5-Year Warranty Three-year warranty - 1 million hours MTBF

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

870 Evo 250GB

Check prices at:

HyperX Savage 480GB

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.