 |
 |
GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon HD 6950 2GB
Intro
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti uses a 40 nm design. nVidia has set the core frequency at 822 MHz. The GDDR5 memory is set to run at a speed of 1002 MHz on this card. It features 384 SPUs as well as 64 Texture Address Units and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.Compare those specifications to the Radeon HD 6950 2GB, which features core clock speeds of 800 MHz on the GPU, and 1250 MHz on the 2048 MB of GDDR5 RAM. It features 1408 SPUs as well as 88 Texture Address Units and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.
Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks
Power Consumption (Max TDP)
| GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
|
170 Watts |
| Radeon HD 6950 2GB |
|
200 Watts |
|
|
Memory Bandwidth
The Radeon HD 6950 2GB, in theory, should be a lot faster than the GeForce GTX 560 Ti overall. (explain)
| Radeon HD 6950 2GB |
|
160000 MB/sec |
| GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
|
128256 MB/sec |
|
|
Texel Rate
The Radeon HD 6950 2GB should be quite a bit (about 34%) better at AF than the GeForce GTX 560 Ti. (explain)| Radeon HD 6950 2GB |
|
70400 Mtexels/sec |
| GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
|
52608 Mtexels/sec |
|
|
Pixel Rate
If running with lots of anti-aliasing is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 560 Ti is the winner, not by a very large margin though. (explain)| GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
|
26304 Mpixels/sec |
| Radeon HD 6950 2GB |
|
25600 Mpixels/sec |
|
|
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.
Price Comparison
GeForce GTX 560 TiAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Radeon HD 6950 2GBAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
Specifications
| Model | GeForce GTX 560 Ti | Radeon HD 6950 2GB |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | nVidia | AMD |
| Year | January 2011 | December 2010 |
| Code Name | GF114 | Cayman Pro |
| Memory | 1024 MB | 2048 MB |
| Core Speed | 822 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory Speed | 4008 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Power (Max TDP) | 170 watts | 200 watts |
| Bandwidth | 128256 MB/sec | 160000 MB/sec |
| Texel Rate | 52608 Mtexels/sec | 70400 Mtexels/sec |
| Pixel Rate | 26304 Mpixels/sec | 25600 Mpixels/sec |
| Unified Shaders | 384 | 1408 |
| Texture Mapping Units | 64 | 88 |
| Render Output Units | 32 | 32 |
| Bus Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| Fab Process | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Transistors | 1950 million | 2640 million |
| Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe x16 |
| DirectX Version | DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |
| OpenGL Version | OpenGL 4.1 | OpenGL 4.1 |
Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of data (counted in megabytes per second) that can be transferred over the external memory interface within a second. The number is worked out by multiplying the interface width by the speed of its memory. If it uses DDR memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and higher screen resolutions.
Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are applied per second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total number of texture units by the core speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in a second.
Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels that the graphics card could possibly write to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is worked out by multiplying the number of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate also depends on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the max fill rate.
GeForce GTX 560 TiAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Radeon HD 6950 2GBAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
|
Comments
15 Responses to “GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon HD 6950 2GB”[...] http://www.hwcompare.com/8888/geforce-gt… [...]
[...] HD 6950 vs. GTX560 According to HWCompare the GTX560 is slightly faster. Ribbon Guidelines:Contact a CoD Admin Reply With [...]
[...] HD 6950 2GB MSI GTX-560-Ti HAWK 1GB Asus GTX-560 Ti DCII TOP 1GB Computerbase Test GTX 560 Ti GTX 560 Ti vs. HD 6950 2GB GTX 560 Ti vs. HD 6950 2GB Nun bin ich froh, wenn ich von eurer Erfahrung profitieren kann. Die [...]
Are you serious with this?
Really, _three_ games?
And judging "fastest card" by counting the TOTAL FPS of those _three_ games? 😀
Not to mention grabbing "power consumption" figures straight from "official specifications" which have little to do with real life.
Check TPU or some other site for proper benchmarks, including power consumption (hint: GTX560 Ti, is NOT faster, and in fact uses more power than 6950)
Agreed with Kaotik. This is possibly the worst comparison I've ever seen. Comparing FPS for three games, two of which have notable Nvidia bias (Dirt 2/Just Cause 2), and then declaring one is faster than the other based purely on tech specs... for shame. Real benchmarks consistently show the 6950 faster across the majority of games, which show just how accurate this comparison really is.
These comparisons are all automated based on database info. But I'll change the wording so it doesn't seem so 'declarative' or whatever.
The benchmarks are real, unless of course Tom's Hardware faked them... which I doubt 🙂
The power consumption figures have to come from official specifications, because it's rare to find sites testing power draw without reporting the total system draw... which can't be used to compare cards because they may have been tested in completely different systems. It's just impractical for comparing things on such a massive scale...
And I don't feel like typing up a disclaimer under every single heading. 😀
Here let me sum this up for you all so this can be put to rest ATI HD5970....need I say more
[...] 2048MB R6950 Twin Frozr II Sau concurenta(560 TI) la un pret mult mai mic si care e si mai buna(GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon HD 6950 2GB – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compar...) adica asa ceva. N-are rost sa strici banii aiurea Placa video Zotac GTX560 Ti 1024MB ZT-50301-10M [...]
stupid french people with their inability to speak english ... i traded my xfx hd6950 2GB for a gainward gtx560 ti... not happy about it, i have less fps in all games, especialy skyrim and bf3. im gonna get my old 6950 back today
Stupid english people that can't differenciate franch from other languages...
[...] 6950> 560TI. 6950 is slightly better than the latter. Check neck to neck benchmarks here: GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon HD 6950 2GB – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compar... __________________ AMD Phenom X3-8650 Overclocked @ 3 Ghz | CM Hyper TX2 | Kingston 2 GB @ 800 [...]
6950 is better than 560ti. I'm proud have 6950 in my pc..save your money for get some better.why not..
[...] بله شما راست میگید . ولی میشه گفت که تقریبا یکی هستن . GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon HD 6950 2GB – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compar... پاسخ با نقل [...]
No way the gtx 560ti is better than Radeon HD 6950 (this test is absurd)