Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R9 Nano

Intro

The GeForce GTX 1650 has core clock speeds of 1485 MHz on the GPU, and 2001 MHz on the 4096 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 896 SPUs along with 56 Texture Address Units and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare those specs to the Radeon R9 Nano, which features a core clock speed of 1000 MHz and a HBM memory frequency of 500 MHz. It also makes use of a 4096-bit memory bus, and makes use of a 28 nm design. It features 4096 SPUs, 256 TAUs, and 64 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 1650 75 Watts
Radeon R9 Nano 175 Watts
Difference: 100 Watts (133%)

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the Radeon R9 Nano should be 291% quicker than the GeForce GTX 1650 in general, because of its higher bandwidth. (explain)

Radeon R9 Nano 512000 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 1650 131072 MB/sec
Difference: 380928 (291%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R9 Nano should be much (more or less 208%) faster with regards to anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GTX 1650. (explain)

Radeon R9 Nano 256000 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 1650 83160 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 172840 (208%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon R9 Nano is much (more or less 35%) better at FSAA than the GeForce GTX 1650, and also capable of handling higher screen resolutions without slowing down too much. (explain)

Radeon R9 Nano 64000 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 1650 47520 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 16480 (35%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 1650

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 Nano

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 1650 Radeon R9 Nano
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year April 2019 September 2015
Code Name TU117-300-A1 Fiji XT
Memory 4096 MB 4096 MB
Core Speed 1485 MHz 1000 MHz
Memory Speed 8004 MHz 500 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 75 watts 175 watts
Bandwidth 131072 MB/sec 512000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 83160 Mtexels/sec 256000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 47520 Mpixels/sec 64000 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 896 4096
Texture Mapping Units 56 256
Render Output Units 32 64
Bus Type GDDR5 HBM
Bus Width 128-bit 4096-bit
Fab Process 12 nm 28 nm
Transistors 4700 million 8900 million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 12.0 DirectX 12.0
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.6 OpenGL 4.5

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of data (in units of MB per second) that can be moved across the external memory interface in one second. It's worked out by multiplying the interface width by its memory clock speed. If it uses DDR type memory, it must be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that are processed per second. This is calculated by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels the graphics card could possibly write to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the amount of ROPs by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel output rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the maximum fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 1650

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 Nano

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield