GeForce RTX 2080 Ti vs Radeon R9 Nano

Intro

Compare all of that to the Radeon R9 Nano, which has a GPU core clock speed of 1000 MHz, and 4096 MB of HBM RAM running at 500 MHz through a 4096-bit bus. It also is made up of 4096 Stream Processors, 256 TAUs, and 64 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti		31381 points
Radeon R9 Nano		14918 points
	Difference: 16463 (110%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon R9 Nano		175 Watts
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti		250 Watts
	Difference: 75 Watts (43%)

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti should be 23% quicker than the Radeon R9 Nano overall, due to its higher data rate. (explain)

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti		630784 MB/sec
Radeon R9 Nano		512000 MB/sec
	Difference: 118784 (23%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is much (more or less 43%) more effective at AF than the Radeon R9 Nano. (explain)

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti		367200 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R9 Nano		256000 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 111200 (43%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti should be quite a bit (approximately 86%) better at FSAA than the Radeon R9 Nano, and able to handle higher screen resolutions better. (explain)

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti		118800 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R9 Nano		64000 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 54800 (86%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of information (in units of MB per second) that can be transported past the external memory interface in one second. It's calculated by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory clock speed. If the card has DDR memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed per second. This is calculated by multiplying the total texture units by the core speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics chip could possibly write to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is worked out by multiplying the amount of colour ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the maximum fill rate.