Nvidia Titan Xp vs Radeon R9 Fury X

Intro

Compare those specifications to the Radeon R9 Fury X, which uses a 28 nm design. AMD has set the core frequency at 1050 MHz. The HBM memory works at a frequency of 500 MHz on this specific card. It features 4096 SPUs along with 256 Texture Address Units and 64 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

Nvidia Titan Xp		27938 points
Radeon R9 Fury X		14793 points
	Difference: 13145 (89%)

Zcash Mining Hash Rate

Nvidia Titan Xp		810 Sol/s
Radeon R9 Fury X		450 Sol/s
	Difference: 360 (80%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Nvidia Titan Xp		250 Watts
Radeon R9 Fury X		275 Watts
	Difference: 25 Watts (10%)

Memory Bandwidth

The Nvidia Titan Xp, in theory, should be just a bit faster than the Radeon R9 Fury X in general. (explain)

Nvidia Titan Xp		560845 MB/sec
Radeon R9 Fury X		512000 MB/sec
	Difference: 48845 (10%)

Texel Rate

The Nvidia Titan Xp is quite a bit (about 41%) more effective at anisotropic filtering than the Radeon R9 Fury X. (explain)

Nvidia Titan Xp		379680 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R9 Fury X		268800 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 110880 (41%)

Pixel Rate

The Nvidia Titan Xp will be a lot (about 126%) faster with regards to FSAA than the Radeon R9 Fury X, and also should be able to handle higher resolutions more effectively. (explain)

Nvidia Titan Xp		151872 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R9 Fury X		67200 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 84672 (126%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of information (counted in megabytes per second) that can be transferred over the external memory interface in a second. The number is calculated by multiplying the interface width by its memory clock speed. If the card has DDR type memory, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are applied per second. This number is worked out by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels that the graphics chip can possibly record to the local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is calculated by multiplying the number of Render Output Units by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the maximum fill rate.