Nvidia Titan Xp vs Radeon R9 Fury X

Intro

Compare all that to the Radeon R9 Fury X, which makes use of a 28 nm design. AMD has clocked the core frequency at 1050 MHz. The HBM RAM works at a speed of 500 MHz on this model. It features 4096 SPUs along with 256 TAUs and 64 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

Nvidia Titan Xp		27938 points
Radeon R9 Fury X		14793 points
	Difference: 13145 (89%)

Zcash Mining Hash Rate

Nvidia Titan Xp		810 Sol/s
Radeon R9 Fury X		450 Sol/s
	Difference: 360 (80%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Nvidia Titan Xp		250 Watts
Radeon R9 Fury X		275 Watts
	Difference: 25 Watts (10%)

Memory Bandwidth

The Nvidia Titan Xp, in theory, should perform just a bit faster than the Radeon R9 Fury X overall. (explain)

Nvidia Titan Xp		560845 MB/sec
Radeon R9 Fury X		512000 MB/sec
	Difference: 48845 (10%)

Texel Rate

The Nvidia Titan Xp is much (approximately 41%) better at anisotropic filtering than the Radeon R9 Fury X. (explain)

Nvidia Titan Xp		379680 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R9 Fury X		268800 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 110880 (41%)

Pixel Rate

The Nvidia Titan Xp is much (about 126%) more effective at anti-aliasing than the Radeon R9 Fury X, and able to handle higher resolutions while still performing well. (explain)

Nvidia Titan Xp		151872 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R9 Fury X		67200 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 84672 (126%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the maximum amount of information (counted in megabytes per second) that can be moved across the external memory interface within a second. The number is worked out by multiplying the card's bus width by the speed of its memory. In the case of DDR memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are processed in one second. This is worked out by multiplying the total texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the graphics card could possibly record to the local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is worked out by multiplying the amount of Render Output Units by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the max fill rate.