Nvidia Titan Xp vs Radeon R7 360

Intro

Compare those specifications to the Radeon R7 360, which uses a 28 nm design. AMD has clocked the core frequency at 1050 MHz. The GDDR5 memory runs at a frequency of 1625 MHz on this card. It features 768 SPUs as well as 48 Texture Address Units and 16 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

Nvidia Titan Xp		27938 points
Radeon R7 360		4110 points
	Difference: 23828 (580%)

Zcash Mining Hash Rate

Nvidia Titan Xp		810 Sol/s
Radeon R7 360		98 Sol/s
	Difference: 712 (727%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon R7 360		100 Watts
Nvidia Titan Xp		250 Watts
	Difference: 150 Watts (150%)

Memory Bandwidth

Performance-wise, the Nvidia Titan Xp should in theory be quite a bit better than the Radeon R7 360 overall. (explain)

Nvidia Titan Xp		560845 MB/sec
Radeon R7 360		104000 MB/sec
	Difference: 456845 (439%)

Texel Rate

The Nvidia Titan Xp should be quite a bit (more or less 653%) more effective at AF than the Radeon R7 360. (explain)

Nvidia Titan Xp		379680 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R7 360		50400 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 329280 (653%)

Pixel Rate

The Nvidia Titan Xp will be much (about 804%) more effective at anti-aliasing than the Radeon R7 360, and also will be capable of handling higher resolutions without slowing down too much. (explain)

Nvidia Titan Xp		151872 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R7 360		16800 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 135072 (804%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the maximum amount of information (in units of megabytes per second) that can be moved across the external memory interface in one second. The number is calculated by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory speed. In the case of DDR type RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied in one second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels that the graphics card can possibly record to the local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is worked out by multiplying the number of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on many other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the maximum fill rate.