Geforce GTX 1080 Ti vs Radeon R9 Fury X

Intro

Compare all of that to the Radeon R9 Fury X, which has a GPU core clock speed of 1050 MHz, and 4096 MB of HBM RAM running at 500 MHz through a 4096-bit bus. It also is made up of 4096 Stream Processors, 256 TAUs, and 64 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

Geforce GTX 1080 Ti		27629 points
Radeon R9 Fury X		14793 points
	Difference: 12836 (87%)

Zcash Mining Hash Rate

Geforce GTX 1080 Ti		710 Sol/s
Radeon R9 Fury X		450 Sol/s
	Difference: 260 (58%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Geforce GTX 1080 Ti		250 Watts
Radeon R9 Fury X		275 Watts
	Difference: 25 Watts (10%)

Memory Bandwidth

As far as performance goes, the Radeon R9 Fury X should theoretically be a bit superior to the Geforce GTX 1080 Ti in general. (explain)

Radeon R9 Fury X		512000 MB/sec
Geforce GTX 1080 Ti		495616 MB/sec
	Difference: 16384 (3%)

Texel Rate

The Geforce GTX 1080 Ti will be much (more or less 23%) more effective at anisotropic filtering than the Radeon R9 Fury X. (explain)

Geforce GTX 1080 Ti		331520 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R9 Fury X		268800 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 62720 (23%)

Pixel Rate

The Geforce GTX 1080 Ti should be quite a bit (more or less 94%) faster with regards to FSAA than the Radeon R9 Fury X, and will be capable of handling higher resolutions better. (explain)

Geforce GTX 1080 Ti		130240 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R9 Fury X		67200 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 63040 (94%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of information (measured in megabytes per second) that can be transferred across the external memory interface in a second. The number is calculated by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory clock speed. If it uses DDR RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that are applied in one second. This is calculated by multiplying the total texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics chip could possibly record to the local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the amount of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate also depends on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.