GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon RX 460 2GB

Intro

Compare those specifications to the Radeon RX 460 2GB, which features a clock speed of 1090 MHz and a GDDR5 memory frequency of 1750 MHz. It also features a 128-bit memory bus, and uses a 14 nm design. It features 896 SPUs, 56 TAUs, and 16 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

Zcash Mining Hash Rate

Radeon RX 460 2GB		117 Sol/s
GeForce GTX 750 Ti		72 Sol/s
	Difference: 45 (63%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 750 Ti		60 Watts
Radeon RX 460 2GB		75 Watts
	Difference: 15 Watts (25%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the Radeon RX 460 2GB will be 30% faster than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti overall, because of its greater data rate. (explain)

Radeon RX 460 2GB		112000 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 750 Ti		86400 MB/sec
	Difference: 25600 (30%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon RX 460 2GB is a lot (approximately 50%) more effective at anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti. (explain)

Radeon RX 460 2GB		61040 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 750 Ti		40800 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 20240 (50%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon RX 460 2GB should be a bit (more or less 7%) better at AA than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti, and also able to handle higher screen resolutions better. (explain)

Radeon RX 460 2GB		17440 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 750 Ti		16320 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 1120 (7%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of data (counted in MB per second) that can be transferred across the external memory interface in one second. It is worked out by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory speed. If it uses DDR type memory, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed in one second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the graphics card could possibly write to the local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is calculated by multiplying the number of Render Output Units by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the max fill rate.