 |
 |
Compare any two graphics cards:
Radeon R9 M385X
| Model | Radeon R9 M385X |
|---|---|
| Year | 2015 |
| Code Name | Bonaire |
| Fab Process | 28 nm |
| Transistors | N/A million |
| Bus | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory | 4096 MB |
| Core Speed | 1100 MHz |
| Cores | 1 |
| Memory Speed | 6000 MHz |
| Unified Shaders | 896 |
| Texture Mapping Units | 56 |
| Render Output Units | 16 |
| Bus Type | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit |
| Direct X Version | 12 |
| OpenGL Version | 4.3 |
| Power (Max TDP) | N/A Watts |
| Bandwidth | 96000 MB/sec |
| Texel Rate | 61600 Mtexels/sec |
| Pixel Rate | 17600 Mpixels/sec |
Prices
Amazon.com
Cards with theoretically similar performance:
Click on any of the following cards to compare it to the Radeon R9 M385X:| Radeon HD 4870 512MB | 115200 |
| Radeon HD 4870 X2 | 115200 |
| GeForce GTX 460 1GB | 115200 |
| GeForce GTX 460 2GB | 115200 |
| Radeon HD 4870 2GB | 115200 |
| Radeon HD 4870 1GB | 115200 |
| Radeon RX 560 | 114688 |
| Radeon RX 550 | 114688 |
| GeForce GTX 1050 | 114688 |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | 114688 |
| Radeon RX 460 2GB | 112000 |
| Radeon RX 460 | 112000 |
| GeForce GTX 960 | 112000 |
| GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 | 111888 |
| GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm | 111888 |
| GeForce GTX 260 | 111888 |
| GeForce GTX 295 | 111888 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | 108800 |
| GeForce GTX 460 (OEM) | 108800 |
| GeForce GTX 950 | 105728 |
| Radeon R7 360 | 104000 |
| Radeon R7 260X | 104000 |
| GeForce 8800 Ultra | 103680 |
| GeForce GTX 465 | 102592 |
| Radeon HD 4790 | 102400 |
| GeForce GTX 550 Ti | 98496 |
| GeForce GTX 1630 | 98304 |
| Radeon HD 7790 | 96000 |
| GeForce GT 450 (OEM) | 96000 |
| GeForce GTX 970M | 96000 |
| GeForce GTX 870M | 96000 |
| Radeon R9 M380 | 96000 |
| Radeon R9 M280X | 88000 |
| GeForce 8800 GTX | 86400 |
| GeForce GTX 650 Ti | 86400 |
| GeForce GTX 460 | 86400 |
| GeForce GTX 750 Ti | 86400 |
| GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB | 86400 |
| GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | 86016 |
| GeForce GTX 750 | 80000 |
| GeForce GTX 650 | 80000 |
| Radeon HD 5770 | 76800 |
| Or select a card to compare it to: |
|
Comments
Be the first to leave a comment!