Compare any two graphics cards:
GeForce 9400 GT 256MB vs Radeon R5 M330
IntroThe GeForce 9400 GT 256MB uses a 65 nm design. nVidia has set the core speed at 550 MHz. The GDDR2 memory works at a speed of 400 MHz on this specific card. It features 16 SPUs as well as 8 Texture Address Units and 4 Rasterization Operator Units.Compare those specs to the Radeon R5 M330, which features GPU core speed of 1030 MHz, and 2048 MB of DDR3 memory set to run at 900 MHz through a 64-bit bus. It also is made up of 320 SPUs, 20 TAUs, and 8 ROPs.
Display Graphs
Power Usage and Theoretical BenchmarksMemory BandwidthThe Radeon R5 M330 should in theory be a small bit faster than the GeForce 9400 GT 256MB overall. (explain)
Texel RateThe Radeon R5 M330 should be a lot (about 368%) faster with regards to texture filtering than the GeForce 9400 GT 256MB. (explain)
Pixel RateIf using lots of anti-aliasing is important to you, then the Radeon R5 M330 is a better choice, and very much so. (explain)
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit. Price Comparison
Display Prices
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though. Specifications
Display Specifications
Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of information (measured in megabytes per second) that can be moved over the external memory interface in a second. It's calculated by multiplying the card's interface width by the speed of its memory. In the case of DDR memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the card's memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and high resolutions. Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied in one second. This is calculated by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in one second. Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics chip can possibly write to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is calculated by multiplying the number of Render Output Units by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on many other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the max fill rate.
Display Prices
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
|
Comments
Be the first to leave a comment!