Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon R9 M265X

Intro

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti makes use of a 28 nm design. nVidia has set the core frequency at 1020 MHz. The GDDR5 memory is set to run at a frequency of 1350 MHz on this specific card. It features 640 SPUs as well as 40 TAUs and 16 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare those specs to the Radeon R9 M265X, which features core speeds of 575 MHz on the GPU, and 1125 MHz on the 2048 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 640 SPUs as well as 40 TAUs and 16 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Memory Bandwidth

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti, in theory, should perform a bit faster than the Radeon R9 M265X in general. (explain)

GeForce GTX 750 Ti 86400 MB/sec
Radeon R9 M265X 72000 MB/sec
Difference: 14400 (20%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti should be quite a bit (approximately 77%) more effective at anisotropic filtering than the Radeon R9 M265X. (explain)

GeForce GTX 750 Ti 40800 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R9 M265X 23000 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 17800 (77%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is a lot (more or less 77%) better at full screen anti-aliasing than the Radeon R9 M265X, and also should be capable of handling higher screen resolutions while still performing well. (explain)

GeForce GTX 750 Ti 16320 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R9 M265X 9200 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 7120 (77%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 M265X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 750 Ti Radeon R9 M265X
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year February 2014 May 1 2014
Code Name GM107 Venus Pro
Memory 2048 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 1020 MHz 575 MHz
Memory Speed 5400 MHz 4500 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 60 watts (Unknown) watts
Bandwidth 86400 MB/sec 72000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 40800 Mtexels/sec 23000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 16320 Mpixels/sec 9200 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 640 640
Texture Mapping Units 40 40
Render Output Units 16 16
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 28 nm 28 nm
Transistors 1870 million (Unknown) million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 11.0 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.4 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of data (in units of megabytes per second) that can be transported over the external memory interface within a second. It is worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory speed. If the card has DDR memory, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied in one second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total amount of texture units by the core speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the graphics card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels that the graphics chip could possibly record to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is calculated by multiplying the number of colour ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the maximum fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 M265X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield