Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon R7 M260X

Intro

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti has a clock frequency of 1020 MHz and a GDDR5 memory speed of 1350 MHz. It also uses a 128-bit memory bus, and makes use of a 28 nm design. It features 640 SPUs, 40 Texture Address Units, and 16 ROPs.

Compare those specs to the Radeon R7 M260X, which has clock speeds of 825 MHz on the GPU, and 1000 MHz on the 2048 MB of GDDR5 RAM. It features 384 SPUs along with 24 TAUs and 8 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the GeForce GTX 750 Ti is 35% quicker than the Radeon R7 M260X overall, because of its greater bandwidth. (explain)

GeForce GTX 750 Ti 86400 MB/sec
Radeon R7 M260X 64000 MB/sec
Difference: 22400 (35%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti should be a lot (more or less 106%) more effective at anisotropic filtering than the Radeon R7 M260X. (explain)

GeForce GTX 750 Ti 40800 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R7 M260X 19800 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 21000 (106%)

Pixel Rate

If using a high screen resolution is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 750 Ti is superior to the Radeon R7 M260X, and very much so. (explain)

GeForce GTX 750 Ti 16320 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R7 M260X 6600 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 9720 (147%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 M260X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 750 Ti Radeon R7 M260X
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year February 2014 June 2014
Code Name GM107 Opal
Memory 2048 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 1020 MHz 825 MHz
Memory Speed 5400 MHz 4000 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 60 watts (Unknown) watts
Bandwidth 86400 MB/sec 64000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 40800 Mtexels/sec 19800 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 16320 Mpixels/sec 6600 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 640 384
Texture Mapping Units 40 24
Render Output Units 16 8
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 28 nm 28 nm
Transistors 1870 million (Unknown) million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x8
DirectX Version DirectX 11.0 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.4 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of information (counted in megabytes per second) that can be transferred past the external memory interface within a second. It's calculated by multiplying the card's bus width by the speed of its memory. If the card has DDR type RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied per second. This is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the video card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels that the graphics card could possibly write to the local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is worked out by multiplying the amount of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel rate also depends on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 M260X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield