Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon R7 M260X

Intro

The GeForce GTX 965M makes use of a 28 nm design. nVidia has set the core speed at 944 MHz. The GDDR5 RAM is set to run at a speed of 1000 MHz on this specific model. It features 1024 SPUs along with 64 TAUs and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare that to the Radeon R7 M260X, which comes with GPU core speed of 825 MHz, and 2048 MB of GDDR5 RAM running at 1000 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also is made up of 384 Stream Processors, 24 TAUs, and 8 Raster Operation Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Memory Bandwidth

Both cards have exactly the same bandwidth, so in theory they should perform the same. (explain)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 965M is quite a bit (approximately 205%) faster with regards to AF than the Radeon R7 M260X. (explain)

GeForce GTX 965M 60416 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R7 M260X 19800 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 40616 (205%)

Pixel Rate

If running with high levels of AA is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 965M is the winner, and very much so. (explain)

GeForce GTX 965M 30208 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R7 M260X 6600 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 23608 (358%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 965M

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 M260X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 965M Radeon R7 M260X
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year January 5 2015 June 2014
Code Name GM204 Opal
Memory 2048 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 944 MHz 825 MHz
Memory Speed 4000 MHz 4000 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 60 watts (Unknown) watts
Bandwidth 64000 MB/sec 64000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 60416 Mtexels/sec 19800 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 30208 Mpixels/sec 6600 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 1024 384
Texture Mapping Units 64 24
Render Output Units 32 8
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 28 nm 28 nm
Transistors (Unknown) million (Unknown) million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x8
DirectX Version DirectX 12 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.5 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of data (measured in megabytes per second) that can be transferred over the external memory interface within a second. The number is worked out by multiplying the bus width by the speed of its memory. If it uses DDR type memory, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are applied in one second. This number is worked out by multiplying the total texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the video card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics card could possibly record to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is worked out by multiplying the amount of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel rate is also dependant on many other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 965M

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 M260X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield