Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce 930M vs GeForce GT 210

Intro

The GeForce 930M comes with core speeds of 928 MHz on the GPU, and 900 MHz on the 2048 MB of DDR3 RAM. It features 384 SPUs as well as 24 TAUs and 8 ROPs.

Compare all of that to the GeForce GT 210, which has core clock speeds of 589 MHz on the GPU, and 800 MHz on the 512 MB of DDR3 RAM. It features 16 SPUs along with 8 TAUs and 4 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Memory Bandwidth

As far as performance goes, the GeForce 930M should theoretically be just a bit better than the GeForce GT 210 in general. (explain)

GeForce 930M 14400 MB/sec
GeForce GT 210 12800 MB/sec
Difference: 1600 (13%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce 930M will be a lot (more or less 373%) better at AF than the GeForce GT 210. (explain)

GeForce 930M 22272 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GT 210 4712 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 17560 (373%)

Pixel Rate

If running with high levels of AA is important to you, then the GeForce 930M is the winner, by a large margin. (explain)

GeForce 930M 7424 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GT 210 2356 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 5068 (215%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce 930M

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

GeForce GT 210

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce 930M GeForce GT 210
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year March 12 2015 October 2009
Code Name GM108 GT218
Memory 2048 MB 512 MB
Core Speed 928 MHz 589 MHz
Memory Speed 1800 MHz 1600 MHz
Power (Max TDP) (Unknown) watts 31 watts
Bandwidth 14400 MB/sec 12800 MB/sec
Texel Rate 22272 Mtexels/sec 4712 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 7424 Mpixels/sec 2356 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 384 16
Texture Mapping Units 24 8
Render Output Units 8 4
Bus Type DDR3 DDR3
Bus Width 64-bit 64-bit
Fab Process 28 nm 40 nm
Transistors (Unknown) million 260 million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0
DirectX Version DirectX 12 DirectX 10.1
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.5 OpenGL 3.2

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of data (in units of MB per second) that can be moved over the external memory interface in a second. The number is calculated by multiplying the interface width by its memory speed. If it uses DDR type memory, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that are applied in one second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics card could possibly record to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the amount of colour ROPs by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel output rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the maximum fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce 930M

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

GeForce GT 210

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield