GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Radeon HD 7990

Intro

Compare all of that to the Radeon HD 7990, which comes with core clock speeds of 950 MHz on the GPU, and 1500 MHz on the 3072 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 2048 SPUs along with 128 Texture Address Units and 32 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

GeForce GTX 980 Ti		17120 points
Radeon HD 7990		15520 points
	Difference: 1600 (10%)

Zcash Mining Hash Rate

Radeon HD 7990		513 Sol/s
GeForce GTX 980 Ti		425 Sol/s
	Difference: 88 (21%)

Ethereum Mining Hash Rate

Radeon HD 7990		32 Mh/s
GeForce GTX 980 Ti		22 Mh/s
	Difference: 10 (45%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 980 Ti		250 Watts
Radeon HD 7990		375 Watts
	Difference: 125 Watts (50%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the Radeon HD 7990 should be a lot faster than the GeForce GTX 980 Ti in general. (explain)

Radeon HD 7990		576000 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 980 Ti		336000 MB/sec
	Difference: 240000 (71%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon HD 7990 is much (about 38%) faster with regards to anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GTX 980 Ti. (explain)

Radeon HD 7990		243200 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 980 Ti		176000 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 67200 (38%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 980 Ti should be quite a bit (more or less 58%) faster with regards to anti-aliasing than the Radeon HD 7990, and should be able to handle higher screen resolutions without slowing down too much. (explain)

GeForce GTX 980 Ti		96000 Mpixels/sec
Radeon HD 7990		60800 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 35200 (58%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

One or more cards in this comparison are multi-core. This means that their bandwidth, texel and pixel rates are theoretically doubled - this does not mean the card will actually perform twice as fast, but only that it should in theory be able to. Actual game benchmarks will give a more accurate idea of what it's capable of.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of information (in units of MB per second) that can be transferred past the external memory interface in one second. The number is worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by the speed of its memory. If the card has DDR type memory, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that can be processed in one second. This number is worked out by multiplying the total number of texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics card can possibly write to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is calculated by multiplying the number of colour ROPs by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel fill rate also depends on lots of other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the max fill rate.