Compare any two graphics cards:
GeForce GTX 970 vs Radeon R9 280
IntroThe GeForce GTX 970 comes with a clock frequency of 1050 MHz and a GDDR5 memory frequency of 1750 MHz. It also makes use of a 256-bit bus, and makes use of a 28 nm design. It features 1664 SPUs, 104 TAUs, and 64 ROPs.Compare those specs to the Radeon R9 280, which features a clock frequency of 933 MHz and a GDDR5 memory frequency of 1250 MHz. It also makes use of a 384-bit memory bus, and uses a 28 nm design. It features 1792 SPUs, 112 Texture Address Units, and 32 Raster Operation Units.
Display Graphs
BenchmarksThese are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score
Zcash Mining Hash Rate
Ethereum Mining Hash Rate
Power Usage and Theoretical BenchmarksPower Consumption (Max TDP)
Memory BandwidthIn theory, the Radeon R9 280 will be 7% quicker than the GeForce GTX 970 in general, because of its greater data rate. (explain)
Texel RateThe GeForce GTX 970 is a small bit (about 5%) more effective at AF than the Radeon R9 280. (explain)
Pixel RateIf running with high levels of AA is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 970 is the winner, by a large margin. (explain)
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit. Price Comparison
Display Prices
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though. Specifications
Display Specifications
Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the maximum amount of information (in units of megabytes per second) that can be transported across the external memory interface in one second. It's worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory clock speed. If the card has DDR type RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions. Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are processed in one second. This is worked out by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in a second. Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the video card can possibly write to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is calculated by multiplying the amount of Render Output Units by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel output rate also depends on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the maximum fill rate.
Display Prices
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
|
Comments
2 Responses to “GeForce GTX 970 vs Radeon R9 280”So, these two cards are pretty much the same, exept at higher resolutions. I got my r9 280 at $130 after Mail in rebate, making it so that you could get three of these for a little bit more than one of the 970's. Wow.
No, you can't compare them. The GTX 970 is faster than a R9 290 and takes only a bit over half the power and is also much cooler. Also, the GTX 970 has a 'real world bandwidth' of ~300 GB/sec, what would be ~25% more - it has this compression technique like the new R9 285, just much better. The Texel Rate isn't really important, because even graphics cards years ago didn't have problems with AF anymore - you can try it yourself: Let the game run with 16xAF and then let it run with 4xAF - almost no performance difference but much cleaner picture...
I've had the Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X and now I'm upgrading to a GTX 970. It's a big difference, not only a small. YOu can throw EVERY game on it with MAX details at 1080p and you'll get stable 60fps... On some older games you can even downsample or run at 4K, like Mirror's Edge. With my R9 280 I sometimes didn't even get 60fps with High Settings @ 1080p and 4xMSAA.