Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

Radeon HD 7950 vs Radeon R9 280

Intro

The Radeon HD 7950 features a core clock frequency of 800 MHz and a GDDR5 memory speed of 1250 MHz. It also makes use of a 384-bit bus, and uses a 28 nm design. It features 1792 SPUs, 112 TAUs, and 32 ROPs.

Compare that to the Radeon R9 280, which makes use of a 28 nm design. AMD has set the core frequency at 933 MHz. The GDDR5 memory is set to run at a frequency of 1250 MHz on this model. It features 1792 SPUs as well as 112 TAUs and 32 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

Radeon R9 280 7961 points
Radeon HD 7950 7731 points
Difference: 230 (3%)

Zcash Mining Hash Rate

Radeon HD 7950 235 Sol/s
Radeon R9 280 183 Sol/s
Difference: 52 (28%)

Ethereum Mining Hash Rate

Radeon R9 280 22 Mh/s
Radeon HD 7950 21 Mh/s
Difference: 1 (5%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon HD 7950 200 Watts
Radeon R9 280 250 Watts
Difference: 50 Watts (25%)

Memory Bandwidth

Both cards have the exact same memory bandwidth, so theoretically they should have the same performance. (explain)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R9 280 should be a small bit (about 17%) more effective at texture filtering than the Radeon HD 7950. (explain)

Radeon R9 280 104496 Mtexels/sec
Radeon HD 7950 89600 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 14896 (17%)

Pixel Rate

If using a high screen resolution is important to you, then the Radeon R9 280 is superior to the Radeon HD 7950, but it probably won't make a huge difference. (explain)

Radeon R9 280 29856 Mpixels/sec
Radeon HD 7950 25600 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 4256 (17%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

Radeon HD 7950

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 280

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model Radeon HD 7950 Radeon R9 280
Manufacturer AMD AMD
Year January 2012 March 2014
Code Name Tahiti Pro Tahiti Pro
Memory 1536 MB 3072 MB
Core Speed 800 MHz 933 MHz
Memory Speed 5000 MHz 5000 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 200 watts 250 watts
Bandwidth 240000 MB/sec 240000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 89600 Mtexels/sec 104496 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 25600 Mpixels/sec 29856 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 1792 1792
Texture Mapping Units 112 112
Render Output Units 32 32
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 384-bit 384-bit
Fab Process 28 nm 28 nm
Transistors 4313 million 4313 million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 11.1 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.2 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of information (counted in MB per second) that can be transferred over the external memory interface in a second. The number is calculated by multiplying the card's bus width by the speed of its memory. If the card has DDR RAM, it must be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that are applied in one second. This number is calculated by multiplying the total texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the video card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels that the graphics chip can possibly record to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the amount of colour ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on many other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

Radeon HD 7950

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 280

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

One Response to “Radeon HD 7950 vs Radeon R9 280”
Jom says:

7950 does not have 1500 MB of RAM, it has 3G. Not at 800 MHz, it is at 850, auto-boosts to 925 if not hot. R9 has 850, boosts to 950 is not hot (1000 for the OC). It also has the same bus width, print density, mapping units and texture units becaue it's the same fucking card. It is not 17% better, not higher TDP.

This is basically all you do. Compare cards. You can't catch on the same card being the same? Way to provide a service. 10 buttons so I can share my findings with the world, not one to report an issue. The bloody frame with prices ALL say 7950 3GB. You didn't even read your own page.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield