 |
 |
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs Radeon HD 4890 2GB
Intro
The GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 makes use of a 65 nm design. nVidia has set the core frequency at 576 MHz. The GDDR3 memory is set to run at a speed of 999 MHz on this card. It features 216 SPUs as well as 72 TAUs and 28 ROPs.Compare all that to the Radeon HD 4890 2GB, which comes with a GPU core clock speed of 1000 MHz, and 2048 MB of GDDR5 memory set to run at 975 MHz through a 256-bit bus. It also is made up of 800(160x5) Stream Processors, 40 TAUs, and 16 Raster Operation Units.
Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks
Power Consumption (Max TDP)
| Radeon HD 4890 2GB |
|
190 Watts |
| GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 |
|
202 Watts |
|
|
Memory Bandwidth
The Radeon HD 4890 2GB should theoretically perform a little bit faster than the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 overall. (explain)
| Radeon HD 4890 2GB |
|
124800 MB/sec |
| GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 |
|
111888 MB/sec |
|
|
Texel Rate
The GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 will be a small bit (about 4%) better at AF than the Radeon HD 4890 2GB. (explain)| GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 |
|
41472 Mtexels/sec |
| Radeon HD 4890 2GB |
|
40000 Mtexels/sec |
|
|
Pixel Rate
If running with lots of anti-aliasing is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 is superior to the Radeon HD 4890 2GB, but not by far. (explain)| GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 |
|
16128 Mpixels/sec |
| Radeon HD 4890 2GB |
|
16000 Mpixels/sec |
|
|
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.
Price Comparison
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Radeon HD 4890 2GBAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
Specifications
| Model | GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 | Radeon HD 4890 2GB |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | nVidia | AMD |
| Year | September 16, 2008 | Apr 2, 2009 |
| Code Name | G200 | RV790 XT |
| Memory | 896 MB | 2048 MB |
| Core Speed | 576 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory Speed | 1998 MHz | 3900 MHz |
| Power (Max TDP) | 202 watts | 190 watts |
| Bandwidth | 111888 MB/sec | 124800 MB/sec |
| Texel Rate | 41472 Mtexels/sec | 40000 Mtexels/sec |
| Pixel Rate | 16128 Mpixels/sec | 16000 Mpixels/sec |
| Unified Shaders | 216 | 800(160x5) |
| Texture Mapping Units | 72 | 40 |
| Render Output Units | 28 | 16 |
| Bus Type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 448-bit | 256-bit |
| Fab Process | 65 nm | 55 nm |
| Transistors | 1400 million | 959 million |
| Bus | PCIe x16 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| DirectX Version | DirectX 10 | DirectX 10.1 |
| OpenGL Version | OpenGL 3.1 | OpenGL 3.0 |
Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the maximum amount of data (counted in MB per second) that can be transported across the external memory interface in one second. It is calculated by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory speed. If it uses DDR RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and higher screen resolutions.
Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are applied in one second. This number is worked out by multiplying the total texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the video card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in a second.
Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics card can possibly record to the local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is calculated by multiplying the number of ROPs by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the maximum fill rate.
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Radeon HD 4890 2GBAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
|
Comments
One Response to “GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs Radeon HD 4890 2GB”[...] PC My PC Specs CPU: Intel Q6600 Go Series @ 3.6ghz Cooler: Cooler Master N520 Motherboard: Asus BadA$$ Overclocker P5k-VM Memory: 4GB 1066 Dominator Rams GPU: Nvidia 260 ECS Black Edition SuperClocked HDD: 1x2 WD HD 250GB 16mb Cache Chassis: CM690 Modded with 5x120MM Fans PSU: SilverStone Zeus 650 Watts Soundcard: SB live 24bit Modded X-fi Xtreme Audio OS: Windows Vista Sp2 / Windows 7 Ulimate My Achievements Total Achievements: 2 I dont agree to u guys. coz i have had the 260GTX 216SP superclocked version for a very long time. and trust me its blazing fast and dont forget the heating issues of 4870 and 4890 and no phyx... soo check this benchmark aswell.....before u jump to any conclusions.. GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs Radeon HD 4890 2GB – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware ... [...]