Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 260 vs GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Intro

The GeForce GTX 260 has a clock speed of 576 MHz and a GDDR3 memory speed of 999 MHz. It also makes use of a 448-bit memory bus, and uses a 65 nm design. It is comprised of 192 SPUs, 64 Texture Address Units, and 28 Raster Operation Units.

Compare those specs to the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216, which has a core clock speed of 576 MHz and a GDDR3 memory speed of 999 MHz. It also makes use of a 448-bit bus, and makes use of a 65 nm design. It features 216 SPUs, 72 Texture Address Units, and 28 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 260 182 Watts
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 202 Watts
Difference: 20 Watts (11%)

Memory Bandwidth

Both cards have exactly the same bandwidth, so in theory they should perform the same. (explain)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 will be a small bit (approximately 13%) faster with regards to texture filtering than the GeForce GTX 260. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 41472 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 260 36864 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 4608 (13%)

Pixel Rate

Both cards have exactly the same pixel fill rate, so theoretically they should perform equally good at at AA, and be capable of handling the same resolutions. (explain)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 260 GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year June 16, 2008 September 16, 2008
Code Name G200 G200
Memory 896 MB 896 MB
Core Speed 576 MHz 576 MHz
Memory Speed 1998 MHz 1998 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 182 watts 202 watts
Bandwidth 111888 MB/sec 111888 MB/sec
Texel Rate 36864 Mtexels/sec 41472 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 16128 Mpixels/sec 16128 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 192 216
Texture Mapping Units 64 72
Render Output Units 28 28
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR3
Bus Width 448-bit 448-bit
Fab Process 65 nm 65 nm
Transistors 1400 million 1400 million
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe x16 2.0
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 10
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 3.1

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of information (counted in megabytes per second) that can be transported past the external memory interface in a second. It is calculated by multiplying the bus width by its memory clock speed. In the case of DDR RAM, it must be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied per second. This is worked out by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the video card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels that the graphics chip can possibly write to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the amount of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel output rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the maximum fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

One Response to “GeForce GTX 260 vs GeForce GTX 260 Core 216”
Rayhan says:

Pls improvement your system

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield