 |
 |
Radeon HD 6950 2GB vs Radeon R9 270X
Intro
The Radeon HD 6950 2GB features a GPU clock speed of 800 MHz, and the 2048 MB of GDDR5 RAM runs at 1250 MHz through a 256-bit bus. It also features 1408 SPUs, 88 Texture Address Units, and 32 ROPs.Compare those specifications to the Radeon R9 270X, which comes with a core clock speed of 1000 MHz and a GDDR5 memory frequency of 1400 MHz. It also makes use of a 256-bit memory bus, and uses a 28 nm design. It is comprised of 1280 SPUs, 80 TAUs, and 32 ROPs.
Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks
Power Consumption (Max TDP)
| Radeon R9 270X |
|
180 Watts |
| Radeon HD 6950 2GB |
|
200 Watts |
|
|
Memory Bandwidth
The Radeon R9 270X, in theory, should perform a small bit faster than the Radeon HD 6950 2GB overall. (explain)
| Radeon R9 270X |
|
179200 MB/sec |
| Radeon HD 6950 2GB |
|
160000 MB/sec |
|
|
Texel Rate
The Radeon R9 270X is just a bit (about 14%) faster with regards to texture filtering than the Radeon HD 6950 2GB. (explain)| Radeon R9 270X |
|
80000 Mtexels/sec |
| Radeon HD 6950 2GB |
|
70400 Mtexels/sec |
|
|
Pixel Rate
The Radeon R9 270X will be much (approximately 25%) faster with regards to FSAA than the Radeon HD 6950 2GB, and should be able to handle higher screen resolutions better. (explain)| Radeon R9 270X |
|
32000 Mpixels/sec |
| Radeon HD 6950 2GB |
|
25600 Mpixels/sec |
|
|
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.
Price Comparison
Radeon HD 6950 2GBAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Radeon R9 270XAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
Specifications
| Model | Radeon HD 6950 2GB | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
| Year | December 2010 | October 2013 |
| Code Name | Cayman Pro | Curacao XT |
| Memory | 2048 MB | 2048 MB |
| Core Speed | 800 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory Speed | 5000 MHz | 5600 MHz |
| Power (Max TDP) | 200 watts | 180 watts |
| Bandwidth | 160000 MB/sec | 179200 MB/sec |
| Texel Rate | 70400 Mtexels/sec | 80000 Mtexels/sec |
| Pixel Rate | 25600 Mpixels/sec | 32000 Mpixels/sec |
| Unified Shaders | 1408 | 1280 |
| Texture Mapping Units | 88 | 80 |
| Render Output Units | 32 | 32 |
| Bus Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| Fab Process | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 2640 million | 2800 million |
| Bus | PCIe x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| DirectX Version | DirectX 11 | DirectX 11.2 |
| OpenGL Version | OpenGL 4.1 | OpenGL 4.3 |
Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of information (in units of MB per second) that can be transferred over the external memory interface in one second. The number is worked out by multiplying the interface width by its memory speed. If the card has DDR RAM, it must be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.
Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that are applied per second. This number is calculated by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied per second.
Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the graphics card could possibly record to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is calculated by multiplying the amount of colour ROPs by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the max fill rate.
Radeon HD 6950 2GBAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Radeon R9 270XAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
|
Comments
One Response to “Radeon HD 6950 2GB vs Radeon R9 270X”Thank you so much for this very helpfull page 🙂
I was looking for an answer if my "old" HD 6950 or the "new" R9 270x is the better choice especially about the task "heat". Cause my graphic cards always go up to 70+ °C.
Keep it up 🙂