Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm vs GeForce GTX 275

Intro

The GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm uses a 55 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core speed at 576 MHz. The GDDR3 RAM works at a speed of 999 MHz on this card. It features 216 SPUs as well as 72 Texture Address Units and 28 ROPs.

Compare those specifications to the GeForce GTX 275, which features a clock speed of 633 MHz and a GDDR3 memory frequency of 1134 MHz. It also makes use of a 448-bit memory bus, and makes use of a 55 nm design. It is comprised of 240 SPUs, 80 TAUs, and 28 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm 171 Watts
GeForce GTX 275 219 Watts
Difference: 48 Watts (28%)

Memory Bandwidth

The GeForce GTX 275, in theory, should perform a little bit faster than the GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm in general. (explain)

GeForce GTX 275 127008 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm 111888 MB/sec
Difference: 15120 (14%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 275 is much (more or less 22%) more effective at texture filtering than the GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm. (explain)

GeForce GTX 275 50640 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm 41472 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 9168 (22%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 275 should be just a bit (about 10%) faster with regards to anti-aliasing than the GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm, and also should be capable of handling higher screen resolutions more effectively. (explain)

GeForce GTX 275 17724 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm 16128 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 1596 (10%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

GeForce GTX 275

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm GeForce GTX 275
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year December 22, 2008 April 9, 2009
Code Name G200b G200b
Memory 896 MB 896 MB
Core Speed 576 MHz 633 MHz
Memory Speed 1998 MHz 2268 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 171 watts 219 watts
Bandwidth 111888 MB/sec 127008 MB/sec
Texel Rate 41472 Mtexels/sec 50640 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 16128 Mpixels/sec 17724 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 216 240
Texture Mapping Units 72 80
Render Output Units 28 28
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR3
Bus Width 448-bit 448-bit
Fab Process 55 nm 55 nm
Transistors 1400 million 1400 million
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe x16 2.0
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 10
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 3.1

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of information (counted in MB per second) that can be moved over the external memory interface in one second. It's worked out by multiplying the interface width by the speed of its memory. If it uses DDR RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that can be applied per second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total amount of texture units by the core speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the video card can possibly write to the local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the number of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel output rate also depends on many other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the maximum fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

GeForce GTX 275

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

One Response to “GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm vs GeForce GTX 275”
[Vând] Placa video eVga gtx 260 SSC 216 SP says:

[...] ca idee asa... ca sa fim realisti putin, GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm vs GeForce GTX 275 – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware ... si acum sa vedem unde este peste gtx 275? in jocuri ce zice? Reply With [...]

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield