Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTS 250 1GB vs Radeon R7 250

Intro

The GeForce GTS 250 1GB uses a 65/55 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core speed at 738 MHz. The GDDR3 RAM works at a speed of 1100 MHz on this card. It features 128 SPUs as well as 64 Texture Address Units and 16 ROPs.

Compare those specifications to the Radeon R7 250, which makes use of a 28 nm design. AMD has set the core speed at 1000 MHz. The GDDR5 memory runs at a speed of 1150 MHz on this particular card. It features 384 SPUs along with 24 Texture Address Units and 8 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon R7 250 65 Watts
GeForce GTS 250 1GB 145 Watts
Difference: 80 Watts (123%)

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the Radeon R7 250 should perform a little bit faster than the GeForce GTS 250 1GB in general. (explain)

Radeon R7 250 73600 MB/sec
GeForce GTS 250 1GB 70400 MB/sec
Difference: 3200 (5%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTS 250 1GB is quite a bit (approximately 97%) better at anisotropic filtering than the Radeon R7 250. (explain)

GeForce GTS 250 1GB 47232 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R7 250 24000 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 23232 (97%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTS 250 1GB should be quite a bit (about 48%) more effective at anti-aliasing than the Radeon R7 250, and will be capable of handling higher screen resolutions more effectively. (explain)

GeForce GTS 250 1GB 11808 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R7 250 8000 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 3808 (48%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTS 250 1GB

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 250

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTS 250 1GB Radeon R7 250
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year March 3, 2009 October 2013
Code Name G92a/b Oland XT
Memory 1024 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 738 MHz 1000 MHz
Memory Speed 2200 MHz 4600 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 145 watts 65 watts
Bandwidth 70400 MB/sec 73600 MB/sec
Texel Rate 47232 Mtexels/sec 24000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 11808 Mpixels/sec 8000 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 128 384
Texture Mapping Units 64 24
Render Output Units 16 8
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 256-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 65/55 nm 28 nm
Transistors 754 million 1040 million
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of data (measured in megabytes per second) that can be transferred past the external memory interface in one second. The number is calculated by multiplying the card's interface width by the speed of its memory. In the case of DDR RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the card's memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are applied in one second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels the video card can possibly write to the local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the amount of Render Output Units by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the maximum fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTS 250 1GB

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 250

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield