Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs GeForce GTX 275

Intro

The GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 makes use of a 65 nm design. nVidia has set the core frequency at 576 MHz. The GDDR3 RAM is set to run at a speed of 999 MHz on this model. It features 216 SPUs along with 72 Texture Address Units and 28 ROPs.

Compare those specs to the GeForce GTX 275, which uses a 55 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core speed at 633 MHz. The GDDR3 RAM runs at a frequency of 1134 MHz on this card. It features 240 SPUs as well as 80 TAUs and 28 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 202 Watts
GeForce GTX 275 219 Watts
Difference: 17 Watts (8%)

Memory Bandwidth

The GeForce GTX 275 should in theory be a bit faster than the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 in general. (explain)

GeForce GTX 275 127008 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 111888 MB/sec
Difference: 15120 (14%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 275 will be a lot (about 22%) better at anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216. (explain)

GeForce GTX 275 50640 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 41472 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 9168 (22%)

Pixel Rate

If using a high screen resolution is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 275 is a better choice, though only just barely. (explain)

GeForce GTX 275 17724 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 16128 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 1596 (10%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

GeForce GTX 275

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 GeForce GTX 275
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year September 16, 2008 April 9, 2009
Code Name G200 G200b
Memory 896 MB 896 MB
Core Speed 576 MHz 633 MHz
Memory Speed 1998 MHz 2268 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 202 watts 219 watts
Bandwidth 111888 MB/sec 127008 MB/sec
Texel Rate 41472 Mtexels/sec 50640 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 16128 Mpixels/sec 17724 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 216 240
Texture Mapping Units 72 80
Render Output Units 28 28
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR3
Bus Width 448-bit 448-bit
Fab Process 65 nm 55 nm
Transistors 1400 million 1400 million
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe x16 2.0
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 10
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 3.1

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of data (counted in MB per second) that can be transferred past the external memory interface within a second. It is worked out by multiplying the bus width by the speed of its memory. If it uses DDR RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that can be processed in one second. This is calculated by multiplying the total texture units by the core speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics card could possibly record to the local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is calculated by multiplying the amount of ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel fill rate also depends on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the maximum fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

GeForce GTX 275

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield